Repose Angle: Why Doesn't Matter Float?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nirav Chavda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Float
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of repose angle and why a mass on an inclined plane does not float but instead slides down with constant speed. Participants debate the roles of gravitational and frictional forces, noting that when static friction balances the gravitational component along the plane, the mass should theoretically remain at rest. However, once disturbed, the transition to kinetic friction leads to sliding, which participants argue is due to the net forces acting on the mass. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding normal force and its impact on friction, ultimately concluding that if the mass is at the limiting angle, it will not move unless disturbed, but once in motion, it will slide down with constant velocity if the forces are balanced. The discussion emphasizes the complexities of motion on inclined planes and the nuances of force interactions.
  • #31
Not with the constant velocity but with accleration. Youuuuuuuuu can calculate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Doc Al said:
Start with the mass resting on the incline at some angle less than the limiting angle. Slowly increase the angle, until it just starts to move. When it starts sliding, kinetic friction (which is generally less than the static friction) takes over and there is a net force downward.


you say the body will have net force downward then it'll accelerate which contradicts the fact that it moves down with CONSTANT SPEED which cannot happen if net force ACTS.
 
  • #33
mukundpa said:
Not with the constant velocity but with accleration. Youuuuuuuuu can calculate it.

this case can be thought to be similar to the body on a horizontal plane.
there when force just equal to the static force is applied the body starts moving but with zero acceleration
 
  • #34
Nirav Chavda said:
let me make it clear for you... THE BODY IS OBSERVED TO MOVE DOWNWARDS WITH CONSTANT VELOCITY-- THATS A FACT not my THOUGHT .
Have you seen this "fact" with your own eyes? Do you have a reference?

I'm doing the "experiment" right now in my office, with an eraser and a clipboard. Sure looks like accelerated motion to me. :wink:

Of course, if you are able to keep the speed very small (with tiny adjustments of angle), it would not surprise me to see the friction changing back and forth from static to kinetic. (The typical models of friction are only approximate.)
 
  • #35
Nirav Chavda said:
this case can be thought to be similar to the body on a horizontal plane.
there when force just equal to the static force is applied the body starts moving but with zero acceleration
How do you start moving with zero acceleration?
 
  • #36
Doc Al said:
How do you start moving with zero acceleration?

brother .. you've got an excellent point there but I'm still uncontent. i'll try get to the main core just wait..
 
  • #37
thank you very much you've solved my problem.
the simple answer to this was that the body will accelerate down due to some smallest inevitable disturbance(at quantum level) and this would change the Static F. to kinetic F. which is lesser. and so new net force acting downwards will be produced resulting in downward motion.

thankyou again for spending your working :wink: hours for helping me out!
meet you at some other forum!
 
  • #38
I am also having difficultly following the question. If the object is initially not moving how can it be also moveing at a constant speed? Speed is 0. How can it be on a frictionless incline (mentioned air frictionless) and be suspended? I need help in visuallizing this. Sorry
 
  • #39
Nirav Chavda said:
the simple answer to this was that the body will accelerate down due to some smallest inevitable disturbance(at quantum level) and this would change the Static F. to kinetic F. which is lesser. and so new net force acting downwards will be produced resulting in downward motion.

Oy vey!

And all you foolish people thought quantum effects cannot manifest themselves clearly at the macroscopic level!

Zz.
 
  • #40
Oy vey! This has got to be one of the most innane threads I've ever seen here - and this from a guy who put a lot of energy into a 9/11 conspiracy thread! I'm sooo glad I didn't see this thread this morning.

Silly ZZ - statements of facts are things I make and you accept...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K