Representation with Fibonacci numbers

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of positive integers using Fibonacci numbers, specifically exploring the conditions under which such representations are unique. The original poster attempts to establish a proof by induction for both the existence and uniqueness of the representation, while addressing a potential error in the initial problem statement regarding the relationship between k and m.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of the initial condition regarding k and m, with some questioning the logic behind the statement. The original poster shares their approach to proving uniqueness through induction and seeks assistance in demonstrating a contradiction for distinct representations.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the initial condition and discussing methods to represent integers as sums of Fibonacci numbers. Some guidance has been offered regarding a binary-like notation and the concept of Zeckendorf Representation, which appears to have been positively received by the original poster.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the initial condition of the problem, which may affect the understanding of the representation. The original poster acknowledges a mistake in the statement, indicating a need for clarification on the definitions and conventions being used.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] Representation with Fibonacci numbers

Homework Statement


Let k >> m mean that m \geq m+2. Show that every positive integers n has a unique representation of the form n = F_{k_1} + F_{k_2} + \cdots F_{k_r}, where F_{k_i} are Fibonacci nuimbers and k_1 >> k_2 >> \cdots k_r >> 0.

EDIT: The first sentence should be: Let k >> m mean that k \geq m+2.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I can show that the representation exists by induction.
To show that the representation is unique, I am also trying to use induction. The uniqueness holds for n = 1,2,3. Assume the result holds for n leq k. If k+1 has two such representations, then these two representation must be pairwise different or else the strong IH is violated. I need help drawing the contradiction in the case where the two representations are pairwise distinct. Then we have that 2k+2 is equal to a sum of distinct Fibonacci numbers leq k+1, which seems like it might be impossible, but I am not sure how to prove that.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


Let k >> m mean that m \geq m+2.
Surely that's not what you meant to write! m\ge m+ 2 is NEVER true so that just says "K>> m" is never true. Did you intend to have a k in that?
 
HallsofIvy said:
Surely that's not what you meant to write! m\ge m+ 2 is NEVER true so that just says "K>> m" is never true. Did you intend to have a k in that?

Yes. That was foolish.
 
anyone?
 
Last edited:
please?
 
First show that you can write any number as a sum of some Fibonacci numbers F_{k_i} where we have the easier condition F_{k_1} > \dots > F_{k_r} > 0. Let's use a "binary-like" notation, where for example:

11011001F

means the sum of the first, fourth, fifth, seventh, and eight Fibonacci numbers (by the way, what convention are you using - what are your first and second Fibonacci numbers?). Now observe that any occurrence of 011 can be replaced with 100 because of the recurrence relation that the Fibonacci sequence satisfies. So the above is equal to:

100100001F

Now you yourself need to come up with a general procedure. By the way, look into "Zeckendorf Representation."
 
AKG said:
By the way, look into "Zeckendorf Representation."

That was EXTREMELY helpful.

http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/ProofThatTheZeckendorfRepresentationOfAPositiveIntegerIsUnique.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K