Representing sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials

In summary: The sum of delta functions is periodic, concentrated at one point per period. The sum of exponentials sets up a sequence of waves aligned with that period that constructively interfere at those points and destructively interfere at the remaining points.The physical meaning of the equation depends on how you are modeling the physical world with mathematical objects. If you have a geometric idea, then you can start to understand the physical meaning. Otherwise, you will need to ask someone else who understands the physical meaning better.
  • #1
RobikShrestha
37
1
I saw this formula while studying Fourier Transform:

[Sum of δ(t-lT) from l=-infinity to l= +infinity] = 1/T * [Sum Of exp(jlΩt) from l=-infinity to l=+infinity].

I am having trouble getting this into my head. How do I prove it or understand the physical meaning of this formula?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Physical meaning depends on how you are modeling the physical world with mathematical objects.

Eyeballing it, I think there's a clear geometric idea here, though. The sum of delta functions is periodic, concentrated at one point per period. The sum of exponentials sets up a sequence of waves aligned with that period that constructively interfere at those points and destructively interfere at the remaining points.I feel it important to point out that neither side makes sense as a function -- this equation could only possibly make sense when viewed as a statement about generalized functions.How to prove it? The most direct way would be by the typical definition of generalized functions: multiply by a generic test function and integrate. If both sides give the same value for all test functions, they are equal as generalized functions.
 
  • #3
Generalized functions? Generic test function? What are they?

It seems I have a lot of studying to do. They are not taught in our college course.

If you have simple explanations then please explain them to me.
 
  • #4
The short answer is that generalized function is something you can integrate with, and their meaning is entirely determined by integration.

For example, if F(x) and G(x) are generalized functions, then we can make sense of their sum F(x) + G(x) as a generalized function: it is defined to be the generalized function such that

[tex]\int (F(x) + G(x)) \varphi(x) \, dx =
\int f(x) \varphi(x) \, dx +
\int G(x) \varphi(x) \, dx[/tex]

for all test functions [itex]\varphi[/itex].

(aside, you should be wary about asking questions like "what is the value of this generalized function at 3?", which has a lot of subtle semantic difficulties)

What is a test function? There are lots of choices for what to call a test function, and each different choice gives a different class of generalized functions.


Two typical definitions are are
  • A test function is a smooth function with compact support (i.e it is zero outside of a bounded set)
  • Rapidly decreasing functions: smooth functions that vanish 'rapidly' as [itex]x \mapsto \pm \infty[/itex].
It would probably be fair to equate "test function" with "well-behaved function".


There are other schemes for generalizing the notion of function. The ones I describe here are called distributions.
 

1. What is the representation of sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials?

The representation of sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials is a mathematical technique used to simplify complex functions involving a sum of delta functions. It involves expressing the sum of delta functions as a sum of exponential functions with specific coefficients.

2. Why is it useful to represent sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials?

Representing sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials can help in solving problems related to signal processing, control systems, and differential equations. It can also simplify calculations and make it easier to analyze and understand the behavior of the system.

3. How is the representation of sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials derived?

The representation is derived using the Laplace transform of the delta function, which states that the Laplace transform of the delta function is equal to 1. By applying this property and manipulating the equations, the representation can be obtained.

4. Can the representation of sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials be generalized to higher dimensions?

Yes, the representation can be generalized to higher dimensions by using the multidimensional Laplace transform. This allows for the representation of multiple delta functions in multiple variables as a sum of exponential functions.

5. Are there any limitations to representing sum of delta functions as sum of exponentials?

One limitation is that the representation may not always exist or may not be unique. This can occur when the coefficients of the exponential functions do not satisfy certain conditions. Additionally, the representation may not be applicable to all types of functions, such as non-smooth or discontinuous functions.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
897
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top