Representing Wavefunction as Superposition of Eigenstates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on representing the wavefunction of a particle in an infinite square well as a superposition of eigenstates. The initial wavefunction is defined piecewise as psi(x,0)=Ax for 0 PREREQUISITES

  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly wavefunctions and eigenstates.
  • Familiarity with the infinite square well model in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of Fourier series and integrals for calculating coefficients Cn.
  • Proficiency in handling piecewise functions in mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of coefficients Cn for piecewise wavefunctions in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the time evolution of wavefunctions in quantum systems.
  • Explore the concept of expectation values in quantum mechanics, particularly for energy.
  • Investigate the implications of superposition and measurement in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in quantum mechanics, physicists working with wavefunctions, and anyone interested in the mathematical representation of quantum states in infinite potential wells.

Kvm90
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A particle in the infinite square well with V(x)=0 for 0<x<a and V(x)=infinity otherwise has the initial (t=0) wave function:

psi(x,0)=Ax for 0<x<a/2
psi(x,0)= A(a-x) for a/2<x<a

1) Sketch psi and psi^2 (DONE)
2) Determine A [DONE - 2*sqrt(3)*a^(-3/2)]
3) Find psi(x,t) (HELP!)
4) What is the probability that a measurement of the energy yields the first eigenenergy level E1 of this infinite square well?
5) Find the expectation value of the energy.

Homework Equations



Psi(x,t)=SUMMATION[Cn*Psi n] = SUM[Cn sin((n*pi*x)/a)

Cn=int(psi(x,0)sin((n*pi*x)/a)
Cn=int(A*x*sin((n*pi*x)/a)) + int(A(a-x)*sin((n*pi*x)/a))

Questions!

Do I replace the 'n's in sin((n*pi*x)/a) with 1 and 2 when I'm solving for Cn? Am I trying to represent the wavefunction as a sum of sin((pi*x)/a) and sin((2*pi*x)/a) ... or do I just leave the quantum number n in my equations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kvm90 said:
Questions!

Do I replace the 'n's in sin((n*pi*x)/a) with 1 and 2 when I'm solving for Cn? Am I trying to represent the wavefunction as a sum of sin((pi*x)/a) and sin((2*pi*x)/a) ... or do I just leave
the quantum number n in my equations?

Nope. In general, an infinite number of eigenfunctions is required to represent an arbitrary wavefunction. Once you carry out your integral (which splits up into two integrals since the initial wavefunction is defined piecewise), you will obtain an expression for cn that depends on n (of course).

Don't forget that the summation you have expressed is actually for \Psi(x,0) and that the time dependence comes in as an extra exponential factor multiplying each eigenfunction.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K