B Reprise: Calculate the distance between two points without using a coordinate system

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the distance between two points A and B using distances to three non-collinear reference points, without relying on a traditional coordinate system. A specific configuration, where the reference points form a right-angled triangle, allows for the calculation of distance using the distances from A and B to these points. The approach utilizes Pythagorean triples, eliminating the need for angles or perpendiculars. The concept of trilateration is highlighted as relevant, particularly in engineering contexts, while acknowledging the limitations of this method as a coordinate system. The exploration of this method offers new insights into the relationship between distances and coordinates.
Trysse
Messages
75
Reaction score
16
About two years ago I had a thread here, where I was looking for a way to calculate the distance between two points A and B on a plane when the following information is given:
  • The distances of the points A and B to three arbitrary (but non-colinear) reference points.
  • The distances between the three reference points.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ing-a-coordinate-system.1014046/#post-6622205

Despite some helpful input, the thread did not get me the answer I was hoping for. So I let the problem rest for a while. Only recently have I come back to this problem. Again I did not find a universal solution for any arbitrary set of reference points. However, this time I have found that I can calculate the distance AB if the three reference points have a specific configuration:

If three reference points O, X and Y form a right-angled triangle, I can calculate the distance between the two points A and B from the distances AO, AX, AY, BO, BX and BY. The right angle XOY can be realized using Pythagorean triples so I don't need to think about constructing right angles.

1712173997192.png

For the calculation of distance and coordinates on a plane and in space see the following Geogebra models. The calculated distance is called AtoB in both files:
What I find nice about this approach, is that I can also calculate cartesian coordinates for points without the need for infinite axes and with only distances (i.e. no angles or directions or perpendiculars and no need to calculate roots (at least for the coordinates)). It has given me a new perspective on cartesian coordinates and the relation between coordinates and invariant distances. I thought this is quite neat!

The related principle is trilateration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateration
From what I have found online this seems to be of more interest for engineering than for geometry/math. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/trilateration

So, although I am no longer looking for a general solution, if you have one, let me know.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I guess one interesting thing to think about - a coordinate system is just a way of assigning numbers that uniquely identifies each point in the plane. Cartesian coordinates and polar coordinates are the two best known ones, but a triple of distances from three specified points is just as validly a coordinate system on its own.

It's kind of a bad one, because as you observed it's really hard to tell where two points are in relation to each other just from their coordinates, but it's still a coordinate system.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and PeroK
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K