B Reprise: Calculate the distance between two points without using a coordinate system

Trysse
Messages
75
Reaction score
16
About two years ago I had a thread here, where I was looking for a way to calculate the distance between two points A and B on a plane when the following information is given:
  • The distances of the points A and B to three arbitrary (but non-colinear) reference points.
  • The distances between the three reference points.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...ing-a-coordinate-system.1014046/#post-6622205

Despite some helpful input, the thread did not get me the answer I was hoping for. So I let the problem rest for a while. Only recently have I come back to this problem. Again I did not find a universal solution for any arbitrary set of reference points. However, this time I have found that I can calculate the distance AB if the three reference points have a specific configuration:

If three reference points O, X and Y form a right-angled triangle, I can calculate the distance between the two points A and B from the distances AO, AX, AY, BO, BX and BY. The right angle XOY can be realized using Pythagorean triples so I don't need to think about constructing right angles.

1712173997192.png

For the calculation of distance and coordinates on a plane and in space see the following Geogebra models. The calculated distance is called AtoB in both files:
What I find nice about this approach, is that I can also calculate cartesian coordinates for points without the need for infinite axes and with only distances (i.e. no angles or directions or perpendiculars and no need to calculate roots (at least for the coordinates)). It has given me a new perspective on cartesian coordinates and the relation between coordinates and invariant distances. I thought this is quite neat!

The related principle is trilateration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trilateration
From what I have found online this seems to be of more interest for engineering than for geometry/math. https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/trilateration

So, although I am no longer looking for a general solution, if you have one, let me know.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I guess one interesting thing to think about - a coordinate system is just a way of assigning numbers that uniquely identifies each point in the plane. Cartesian coordinates and polar coordinates are the two best known ones, but a triple of distances from three specified points is just as validly a coordinate system on its own.

It's kind of a bad one, because as you observed it's really hard to tell where two points are in relation to each other just from their coordinates, but it's still a coordinate system.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker and PeroK
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top