Required acceleration for takeoff

  • Thread starter Thread starter J-Girl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the constant acceleration required for a jumbo jet to take off, given a specific takeoff velocity and runway distance. The problem involves concepts from kinematics and unit conversion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate acceleration using time and velocity but arrives at different results. They question the validity of their calculations and seek clarification on the correct approach.
  • Some participants suggest using kinematic equations and emphasize the importance of unit consistency in calculations.
  • Others express confusion about the results obtained and inquire about potential errors in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering guidance on kinematic equations and unit conversions. There is a recognition of the need for unit consistency, and some progress is being made in understanding the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the conversion of units from kilometers and kilometers per hour to meters and meters per second, which is crucial for solving the problem correctly.

J-Girl
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Ive come across this question, and just pondering on is i am right or completely wrong?! The question is: A jumbo jet must reach a velocity of 360km/h for takeoff. It uses a 1.8km runway. What is the constant acceleration required for it to reach the velocity before takeoff?

I tried a few different times but sometimes I get different answers. So, I have the required velocity, the distance and so far the acceleration is x.
So, first I calculated the time from 0 to 360km/h down a 1.8km runway. 360=1.8/t
=360t=0.005 hours
= 18 seconds to move down the runway.
And now i do Velocity- acceleration x time
360=A18
360/18=A
A=20km/hour or 5.56m/s

Is this completely wrong:(?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi...
I think the proper course would be to recall the proper kinematic properties of constant acceleration and displacement...
You are, no dobut acquainted with: v^2 = {v_0}^2+2as, where a is the constant acceleration, and s is the distance travelled.
Try working up from here,
Daniel
P.S
Check the units for acceleration, that should also point you in the proper direction
 
Last edited:
i tried that before but my answer came to be 36,000!?
As initial velocity was 0, i did: 360^2=0+2a(1.8)
= 129,600=3.6a
a=36,000
What am I missing?
 
Actually, yes...
If you take heed to my post-script, you'd find that units must be conserved.
You're given entries in Km & Km/h, but you're obviously looking for results in \frac{m}{s^2}-This being the acceleration.
Are you aware as to how this conversion should take place?(From Km-m, Km/h, m/s)...
Plugging in the data properly should land you exactly where you need to be..
Daniel
 
still don't get it:( does that mean that 36,000 is right but just in the wrong units??
 
Yes, that's actually what had happened.
Look, in 1 km there are 1000m, right?
And in one hour, there should be 3600 seconds(60sec*60min).
If you then use this scale on your results(by multiplying by 1000 and dividing by 3600) you should be in the clear...
However, be sure that you do this BEFORE you paste in your variables. First, convert your V and then your s(or x). Otherwise, you'd end-up with Km/h^2 which is a different and more complex story...
Was that helpful?
Good luck,
Daniel
 
ohh I am sort of getting it now. thanks for all your help, much appreciated:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K