Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the future prospects of research in photonic crystals, particularly in the context of pursuing a PhD. Participants explore the implications of funding trends and the evolving landscape of research fields, including comparisons to materials like graphene.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses concern about the future of photonic crystals and seeks insights on whether the field will continue to be actively researched.
- Another participant cites a quote from Bohr, emphasizing the uncertainty in predicting future trends.
- Some participants suggest that the individual pursuing a master's degree may have better insights into the field than those outside it.
- A senior researcher advised the original poster to consider abandoning photonic crystals in favor of materials like graphene, citing decreasing funding for photonic crystal research.
- Concerns are raised about the cyclical nature of research funding, with one participant noting that many fields experience similar funding fluctuations over time.
- It is mentioned that while photonic crystals were once a "hot" topic, the field may now be in a more mature phase, similar to other areas of research.
- Some participants argue that choosing a research area based solely on current funding may lead to challenges in the future if interest shifts away from that field.
- There is a suggestion that photonic crystals, despite funding decreases, may not be in a worse situation than other mature fields.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the future viability of photonic crystals versus other materials research fields. There are differing opinions on the implications of funding trends and the cyclical nature of research interest.
Contextual Notes
Participants discuss the potential impact of funding on research opportunities and the importance of understanding the reasons behind advice from senior researchers. The conversation reflects uncertainty regarding the long-term prospects of various research areas.