Research in Photonic Crystals worth it?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the future prospects of research in photonic crystals, particularly in the context of pursuing a PhD. Participants explore the implications of funding trends and the evolving landscape of research fields, including comparisons to materials like graphene.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the future of photonic crystals and seeks insights on whether the field will continue to be actively researched.
  • Another participant cites a quote from Bohr, emphasizing the uncertainty in predicting future trends.
  • Some participants suggest that the individual pursuing a master's degree may have better insights into the field than those outside it.
  • A senior researcher advised the original poster to consider abandoning photonic crystals in favor of materials like graphene, citing decreasing funding for photonic crystal research.
  • Concerns are raised about the cyclical nature of research funding, with one participant noting that many fields experience similar funding fluctuations over time.
  • It is mentioned that while photonic crystals were once a "hot" topic, the field may now be in a more mature phase, similar to other areas of research.
  • Some participants argue that choosing a research area based solely on current funding may lead to challenges in the future if interest shifts away from that field.
  • There is a suggestion that photonic crystals, despite funding decreases, may not be in a worse situation than other mature fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the future viability of photonic crystals versus other materials research fields. There are differing opinions on the implications of funding trends and the cyclical nature of research interest.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the potential impact of funding on research opportunities and the importance of understanding the reasons behind advice from senior researchers. The conversation reflects uncertainty regarding the long-term prospects of various research areas.

shpongle
Hi

I am doing my Masters by research in Photonic Crystals and I want to do a PhD later as I dream of an academic. I wanted to know to if the field of photonic crystals offers opportunities for growth in the future. Will this field be actively researched in the future?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As Bohr said, "It is difficult to predict, especially the future."
 
The thing is, if you're doing a master's degree in the subject, you're likely in a better position to answer that than those outside of the field.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
As Bohr said, "It is difficult to predict, especially the future."


Thank you. That is a thought provoking quote.
 
Choppy said:
The thing is, if you're doing a master's degree in the subject, you're likely in a better position to answer that than those outside of the field.


Thank you for the reply. I was in a dilemma after one of the senior researchers advised me to abandon PhCs in lieu of materials, graphene, etc
 
shpongle said:
Thank you for the reply. I was in a dilemma after one of the senior researchers advised me to abandon PhCs in lieu of materials, graphene, etc

So then the question is what were his reasons for advising you in such a manner? Was he warning you against studying photonic crystals, or does he forsee something more lucrative in the materials research?

It's generally a good idea to talk with the senior researchers in your group and in most cases you can give some weight to their opinions. But it's always a good idea to understand the "why" behind the advice, rather than just accepting the advice because of this person's position. (Perhaps that's the reason you posted the question here in the first place.)
 
Choppy said:
So then the question is what were his reasons for advising you in such a manner? Was he warning you against studying photonic crystals, or does he forsee something more lucrative in the materials research?

It's generally a good idea to talk with the senior researchers in your group and in most cases you can give some weight to their opinions. But it's always a good idea to understand the "why" behind the advice, rather than just accepting the advice because of this person's position. (Perhaps that's the reason you posted the question here in the first place.)

Thank you. The reason she asked me to do so was that the funding for research in photonic crystals has been decreasing steadily. She asked me to go where the funding is! She also mentioned that until few years ago there was a lot of research into PhCs but it not the case now.
 
shpongle said:
Thank you. The reason she asked me to do so was that the funding for research in photonic crystals has been decreasing steadily. She asked me to go where the funding is! She also mentioned that until few years ago there was a lot of research into PhCs but it not the case now.

But that happens to ALL subjects. Photonic crystals were "hot" a few years ago and hence received what could perhaps be described as an disproportionate amount of funding. After a few years all the low hanging fruits (i.e. the "easy" experiments etc) are gone and the people in the field themselves in the same situation as all other researchers in more mature fields.

The current "hot topic" is graphene but research in that are is also slowing down (or at least maturing) and focus is perhaps shifting towards other 2D materials. In two years something else will be "hot" and so on.

Hence, choosing a field because of the amount of funding might be a good idea in the short term, but might backfire if you end up with a PhD in a subject that people have lost interest in by the time you finish (which happens). Or, alternatively, you end up with a PhD in subject where there will effectivly be a surplus of people (as is likely to happen with graphene in 2-3 years)

Photonic crystals have been around for a quite a long time, and although the funding might be decreasing I doubt they are in a worse situation than any other mature field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K