Research Paper on Time Travel: Ideas for Modern Physics

Click For Summary
Writing a 12-page research paper on time travel may be challenging due to the abstract and complex nature of the theories involved. Suggestions for alternative topics in modern physics include band-gap theory, quantum gravity, and specific phenomena like the twins paradox. The discussion emphasizes the need for a clear thesis statement and suggests incorporating philosophical perspectives, particularly through films like "Back to the Future." Participants recommend using resources such as "Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction" by Paul J. Nahin for comprehensive material. Engaging with the community for feedback and specific questions is encouraged to refine the paper's direction.
  • #31
Pengwuino said:
You really do need to post specifics about this paper or else no one is going to help you.
I need to write a 12 page research paper on time travel for a humanities class ...

i need help developing thesis statement/question ... or just an argument in general

my prof suggested to include movies ... I'm not sure if that's a good idea

i might need to be more specific than that, I don't know ... I usually have hard time presenting my thoughts ... if you are still confused about my assignment, please let me know and i'll try to explain it more in detail :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Well what do you want to know about? What are you trying to present?

Why it may be possible? Why it may not be possible? Theories behind possible time travel? Just a history of time travel theories?

I'm not sure why this professor wants movies because even the utmost ignorant professor should know movies are about as accurate as... hmm.. can't think of a good analogy but they are very inaccurate! Or well, I'm not sure, there have been a lot of very accurate movies when it comes to things like history... but movies with science in them are almost always dead wrong or way off the mark.
 
  • #33
Pengwuino said:
Well what do you want to know about? What are you trying to present?

Why it may be possible? Why it may not be possible? Theories behind possible time travel? Just a history of time travel theories?

I'm not sure why this professor wants movies because even the utmost ignorant professor should know movies are about as accurate as... hmm.. can't think of a good analogy but they are very inaccurate! Or well, I'm not sure, there have been a lot of very accurate movies when it comes to things like history... but movies with science in them are almost always dead wrong or way off the mark.

i can present anything i want

and what my prof wanted me to do is to use my knowledge on time travel and dissect Back to the Future (i presume on a philosophical level rather than scientific level)
now what my poor soul doesn't understand is how can i write 12 pages on that?!
 
  • #34
Sounds kinda stupid to be honest...

12 pages from a philisophical angle still seems like an insurmountable task. I mean all you can really ask are questions and I wouldn't think there's much out there to help answer or even think about those questions.
 
  • #35
i'm tryin to come up with a good thesis statement as of now
 
  • #36
sweetvirgogirl said:
it's for a humanities class

Oh, then that opens up even more possibilities! A variation on the grandfather paradox is always good - traveler goes back in time and prevents her grandparents from ever meeting etc. Or the causality paradox where the same traveler goes back in time to prevent her grandparents from meeting but ends up causing them to meet.
 
  • #37
Time travel is discussed from a variety of perspectives in "Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction" by Paul J. Nahin, which is a wonderful book. Kip Thorne, a first-rate relativistist at Cal Tech, wrote a foreword for the second edition of this book. Here's a quote from his foreword: "It now is not only the most complete documentation of time travel in science fiction; it is also the most thorough review of serious scientific literature on the subject - a review that, remarkably, is scientifically accurate and at the same time largely accessible to a broad audience of nonspecialists."

See if your library has a copy of the second edition of this book; if not, get it through interlibrary loan. I think you'll find that this book has more than enough material for your paper.

Also, someone put the latest edition (Jan.? Feb. ?) of Astronomy Magazine on my desk today, and I noticed that the cover article is about time travel.

Regards,
George
 
  • #38
Ohh come now, you should be able to write a book on "Back to the Future". Pick something, it doesn't matter what, it's a humanities class. Make "something" up and justifiy that "something". It has nothing to do with physics.

Here's your thesis, just flush it out.

Back to the Future is the greatest movie ever, it has many deep philosophical levels. // Note the sarcasm
 
  • #39
Pengwuino said:
Sounds kinda stupid to be honest...

12 pages from a philisophical angle still seems like an insurmountable task. I mean all you can really ask are questions and I wouldn't think there's much out there to help answer or even think about those questions.
i got to do what i got to do :(
 
  • #40
George Jones said:
Time travel is discussed from a variety of perspectives in "Time Machines: Time Travel in Physics, Metaphysics, and Science Fiction" by Paul J. Nahin, which is a wonderful book. Kip Thorne, a first-rate relativistist at Cal Tech, wrote a foreword for the second edition of this book. Here's a quote from his foreword: "It now is not only the most complete documentation of time travel in science fiction; it is also the most thorough review of serious scientific literature on the subject - a review that, remarkably, is scientifically accurate and at the same time largely accessible to a broad audience of nonspecialists."
See if your library has a copy of the second edition of this book; if not, get it through interlibrary loan. I think you'll find that this book has more than enough material for your paper.
Also, someone put the latest edition (Jan.? Feb. ?) of Astronomy Magazine on my desk today, and I noticed that the cover article is about time travel.
Regards,
George

i do have Time Machine by Paul J Nahin right in front of me, but I think I have the first edition ... it should still work though

so suggest me a thesis statement please :(
 
  • #41
nbo10 said:
Ohh come now, you should be able to write a book on "Back to the Future". Pick something, it doesn't matter what, it's a humanities class. Make "something" up and justifiy that "something". It has nothing to do with physics.

Here's your thesis, just flush it out.

Back to the Future is the greatest movie ever, it has many deep philosophical levels. // Note the sarcasm
yeah lol i was thinking something like "why do scifi movies portray time travel in such a wrong/weak way?"

and my friend was like ... "they're called FICTION for a reason"

I think he has a point :(
 
  • #42
If you want an ethical dilemma (always good for a humans class), try this one : supposing time travel to the past were possible and you could alter history but not know the ramifications beforehand - would you go back in time to assassinate Hitler as a baby ? As a young adult before his ascent to power and before he committed genocide and started the second world war ?
 
  • #43
Curious3141 said:
If you want an ethical dilemma (always good for a humans class), try this one : supposing time travel to the past were possible and you could alter history but not know the ramifications beforehand - would you go back in time to assassinate Hitler as a baby ? As a young adult before his ascent to power and before he committed genocide and started the second world war ?
a very good idea ... but i think my teacher won't be very happy if i take it more towards history and ethical dilemma
see what i mean?
like the thesis you suggested is great, but it's not about time travel or sci fi or anything ... it's about hitler
 
  • #44
sweetvirgogirl said:
like the thesis you suggested is great, but it's not about time travel or sci fi or anything ... it's about hitler
It most certainly is about time travel. You don't have to focus on Hitler, just on the ramifications of traveling back in time and potentially altering history. Explore the different paradoxes of time travel.
 
  • #45
Maxwell said:
It most certainly is about time travel. You don't have to focus on Hitler, just on the ramifications of traveling back in time and potentially altering history. Explore the different paradoxes of time travel.
i see what you're saying ... but then why involve hitler? to make it spicier? (it also might be misleading ... but maybe not ... depends on how my prof views it)

also, just exploring different paradoxes won't help me cover 12 pages ... because there arent many paradoxes .. in fact there is just one BASIC paradox ... correct me if I'm wrong
 
  • #46
sweetvirgogirl said:
i see what you're saying ... but then why involve hitler? to make it spicier? (it also might be misleading ... but maybe not ... depends on how my prof views it)
No, as an example of going back in time and making an insanely drastic change to history. I'd say killing Hitler as a child would effectively be the same thing as "re-writing" a good amount of history. Hitler is only one such example -- there are plenty -- Washington, Napoleon, Jesus, etc.
sweetvirgogirl said:
also, just exploring different paradoxes won't help me cover 12 pages ... because there arent many paradoxes .. in fact there is just one BASIC paradox ... correct me if I'm wrong
You're very wrong. Plus, you can spend a good portion discussing different methods of time travel, why it is or isn't physically possible, types of research going into time travel and other theories. Just think a little.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-travel-phys/
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/time_travel.html
Etc.
 
  • #47
Maxwell said:
No, as an example of going back in time and making an insanely drastic change to history. I'd say killing Hitler as a child would effectively be the same thing as "re-writing" a good amount of history. Hitler is only one such example -- there are plenty -- Washington, Napoleon, Jesus, etc.
You're very wrong. Plus, you can spend a good portion discussing different methods of time travel, why it is or isn't physically possible, types of research going into time travel and other theories. Just think a little.
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-travel-phys/


http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/GR/time_travel.html
Etc.

well what i meant was ... the basic paradox is the changes you make in past, how do they affect the present... or do they?
now there are several catogaries ... like granny paradox etc or killing your younger self ...
yeah i know people think there are tons of paradoxes ... but when i think about them ... they just seem to me as different forms of the same paradox ... if you know what i mean
 
  • #48
yeah i know people think there are tons of paradoxes ... but when i think about them ... they just seem to me as different forms of the same paradox ... if you know what i mean
Uh... that's like saying pies and jelly are different forms of dessert.
 
  • #49
I don't buy this whole grandfather paradox crap. It seems like the very fact that you exist in a different time, the very fact that you move a molecule or fart in the wind could destroy all of history or something insane like that. It seems like if you walked up to your grandfather and tapped on him or closed a door behind him or any slight as hell thing and you could move some molecule or move some sperm a hundredth of an inch making it so that you arent the result of the sperm and egg that you eventually came out of. Everyone seems to take this paradox as involving these large single objects called "humans" and "animals" and what not. I see it as tremendous numbers of moving molecules and killing a human for the 'grandfather paradox' or whatever mainstream idea is the equivalent to just pushing someone in my view or even raising the temperature of the air around them.

If we look at this from a quantum mechanical view, it sounds like the universe would have to re-run the odds all over again unless there is some sort of system that indeed does turn quantum physics into something that is not based on probabilities, the universe would statistically have to be completely different. The smallest deviation when these probabilities are 'run' seems like it would just spread and multiply like a virus unless there woudl be some sort of dampening effect towards some sort of semi-pre-determined state of history which i can't think of at 8am in the morning with no sleep behind me.

ahhhh!
 
  • #50
Pengwuino said:
I don't buy this whole grandfather paradox crap. It seems like the very fact that you exist in a different time, the very fact that you move a molecule or fart in the wind could destroy all of history or something insane like that. It seems like if you walked up to your grandfather and tapped on him or closed a door behind him or any slight as hell thing and you could move some molecule or move some sperm a hundredth of an inch making it so that you arent the result of the sperm and egg that you eventually came out of. Everyone seems to take this paradox as involving these large single objects called "humans" and "animals" and what not. I see it as tremendous numbers of moving molecules and killing a human for the 'grandfather paradox' or whatever mainstream idea is the equivalent to just pushing someone in my view or even raising the temperature of the air around them.
If we look at this from a quantum mechanical view, it sounds like the universe would have to re-run the odds all over again unless there is some sort of system that indeed does turn quantum physics into something that is not based on probabilities, the universe would statistically have to be completely different. The smallest deviation when these probabilities are 'run' seems like it would just spread and multiply like a virus unless there woudl be some sort of dampening effect towards some sort of semi-pre-determined state of history which i can't think of at 8am in the morning with no sleep behind me.
ahhhh!
thats what i meant ... it all comes down to one basic paradox ...

anyway ... PLEASE HELP ME WITH MY PAPER ... It'll be such a big favor :(
 
  • #51
This SHOULD NOT have to drag on for four pages. Why are you wasting so much time here instead of writing your paper? You could have been half way done by now. You're much too general for anyone to understand you. In 4 pages of talking to the other member's of this board, you're still at the starting gate. I mean come on what is going on here?
 
  • #52
OptimusPrime said:
This SHOULD NOT have to drag on for four pages. Why are you wasting so much time here instead of writing your paper? You could have been half way done by now. You're much too general for anyone to understand you. In 4 pages of talking to the other member's of this board, you're still at the starting gate. I mean come on what is going on here?
yeah ... but I still couldn't get the help.
I have this problem that I cannot write and think clearly ... maybe that's why i confused you guys earlier
but i think i did explain my assignment more in detail ...
Here:
"I need to write a 12 page research paper on time travel for a humanities class ...

i need help developing thesis statement/question ... or just an argument in general

my prof suggested to include movies ... I'm not sure if that's a good idea

i might need to be more specific than that, I don't know ... I usually have hard time presenting my thoughts ... if you are still confused about my assignment, please let me know and i'll try to explain it more in detail :( "
 
  • #53
There was a gap between 12/10 and 12/20 where you didn't right any messages here. When is the paper due?
 
  • #54
OptimusPrime said:
There was a gap between 12/10 and 12/20 where you didn't right any messages here. When is the paper due?
the paper was due a while ago ... but i fell super sick ...
so they extended the deadline for me
but i still hafta turn in the paper as soon as possible, because I have another paper due from another class ... and I can't start workin on that paper until i get done with this one
 
Last edited:
  • #55
the thesis statement I'm currently interested in is

"the way certain sci-fi movies portray time travel is wrong"

1) the probs with that is i don't want to talk about more than 2-3 movies in my paper

2) another prob is they're called FICTION for a reason, they never claim to be totally right anyway
 
Last edited:
  • #56
3) Christopher Lloyd is one of the finest actors of our time.
 
  • #57
Wishbone said:
3) Christopher Lloyd is one of the finest actors of our time.
excuse me?
hows that related to the topic
 
  • #58
sweetvirgogirl said:
the thesis statement I'm currently interested in is
"the way certain sci-fi movies portray time travel is wrong"
1) the probs with that is i don't want to talk about more than 2-3 movies in my paper
2) another prob is they're called FICTION for a reason, they never claim to be totally right anyway

So discuss the "reality of time travel," and use the films to describe some misconceptions people have about time travel -- the philosophical and physical aspects of it.
 
  • #59
Maxwell said:
So discuss the "reality of time travel," and use the films to describe some misconceptions people have about time travel -- the philosophical and physical aspects of it.
can i get away with using only 2-3 movies on time travel as examples?
in particular, I've seen back to the future I, donnie darko and terminator II ... i don't think i want to watch any other movies :(

also, my friend was like "uh they're FICTION... not real "
do you think I can still diss them movies bor being not quite right?
 
Last edited:
  • #60
sweetvirgogirl said:
can i get away with using only 2-3 movies on time travel as examples?
in particular, I've seen back to the future I, donnie darko and terminator II ... i don't think i want to watch any other movies :(
also, my friend was like "uh they're FICTION... not real "
do you think I can still diss them movies bor being not quite right?

No, they are science fiction so they were never meant to be accurate nor advertised themselves as accurate so you have no basis to make fun of them. Also, it is not necessarily true that the movies were wrong since we don't even know if that kinda time traveling is possible in the first place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
363
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K