Resistance between coaxial cylinders

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 12K views
Reshma
Messages
749
Reaction score
6
Two coaxial cylinders, inner radius a and outer radius b are separated by a material of conductivity given by [itex]\sigma (r) = k/r[/itex] for some constant 'k'. Find the resistance between the cylinders.

Here the conductivity is a function of position and the charge density is not zero in the resistive medium, and the electric field [itex]\vec E[/itex] does not go as 1/r. So how is this problem solved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Reshma said:
Two coaxial cylinders, inner radius a and outer radius b are separated by a material of conductivity given by [itex]\sigma (r) = k/r[/itex] for some constant 'k'. Find the resistance between the cylinders.

Here the conductivity is a function of position and the charge density is not zero in the resistive medium, and the electric field [itex]\vec E[/itex] does not go as 1/r. So how is this problem solved?

Assuming steady state, div j=0 so j=j_0/r and E=j/\sigma=constant.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Assuming steady state, div j=0 so j=j_0/r and E=j/\sigma=constant.
The charge density is not zero here, so [itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = {1\over \sigma}\vec \nabla \cdot \vec J = 0[/itex] will not hold good.
 
Reshma said:
The charge density is not zero here, so [itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = {1\over \sigma}\vec \nabla \cdot \vec J = 0[/itex] will not hold good.

Div E is NOT zero. Div j is zero because rho is constant in time.
Your equation above should be
[itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = \vec \nabla \cdot [\vec J/\sigma] ,[/itex]
but Div j does =0.
Do you want to argue or to do the problem?
 
Last edited:
Meir Achuz said:
Div E is NOT zero. Div j is zero because rho is constant in time.
Your equation above should be
[itex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = \vec \nabla \cdot [\vec J/\sigma] ,[/itex]
but Div j does =0.
Do you want to argue or to do the problem?
Ok, here goes...
I need to evaluate the current and the voltage in order to find the resistance.
[tex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec E = \vec \nabla \cdot [\vec J/\sigma][/tex]

Integrating over a volume dV.
[tex]\int \vec \nabla \cdot \vec E dV= \int \vec \nabla \cdot [\vec J/\sigma] dV[/tex]

By Divergence theorem,

[tex]\int \vec E \cdot d\vec a = \int (\vec J /\sigma)\cdot d\vec a[/tex]

[tex]{Q_{enc}\over \epsilon_0} = \int (\vec J /\sigma)\cdot d\vec a[/tex]

I'm getting stuck here. I don't know how to proceed.

Anyway, I found the current.
But by Ohm's law, [itex]\vec J = \sigma \vec E[/itex]
Current I is given by;
[tex]I = \int \vec J \cdot d\vec a = \int {k\over r}\vec E \cdot d\vec a[/tex]

But, I need [itex]\vec E[/itex] to compute the voltage. How do I do that?
 
Last edited:
Meir Achuz said:
Assuming steady state, div j=0 so j=j_0/r and E=j/\sigma=constant.
[tex]\vec \nabla \cdot \vec J = 0[/tex]
[tex]J = {J_0\over r}[/tex]
[tex]E = {J\over \sigma} = {J_0\over r} {r\over k} = {J_0\over k}[/tex]

[tex]I_{enc} = \int \vec J \cdot d\vec a = \int_a^b {J_0\over r} 2\pi r dr = J_0 2\pi (b-a)[/tex]

[tex]V_a - V_b = -\int_b^a \vec E \cdot d\vec r = {J_0\over k}(b-a)[/tex]

Resistance R will be:
[tex]R = \frac{V_a - V_b}{I} = \left({J_0\over k}(b-a)\right)\left({1\over (J_0 2\pi (b-a)}\right)[/tex]
[tex]R = {1\over 2\pi k}[/tex]

Thank you for your time!