How Does Frequency Affect the Resistivity of Silver as a Plasma?

  • Thread starter Thread starter alisonb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistivity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the resistivity of silver as a plasma using the equation of motion for electrons in an electric field, specifically \(\sigma_{N}=\frac{Ne^{2}}{m_{e}(i\omega + \tau^{-1})}\). The user successfully calculated the scattering time \(\tau\) at low frequencies but struggled with determining the frequency at which resistivity increases by a factor of 10. The conversation highlights the importance of considering the imaginary part of the conductivity equation and suggests using polar form to analyze the resistivity further. Additionally, it clarifies the distinction between conductivity (\(\sigma\)) and resistivity (\(\rho\)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of plasma physics and electron motion in electric fields
  • Familiarity with the concepts of conductivity and resistivity
  • Knowledge of complex numbers and polar form representation
  • Basic principles of frequency response in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn how to derive frequency-dependent resistivity using complex impedance
  • Study the application of polar form in electrical engineering
  • Explore the relationship between scattering time and frequency in conductive materials
  • Investigate the physical significance of phase difference in AC circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics and electrical engineering, particularly those studying plasma behavior, conductivity, and resistivity in materials like silver.

alisonb
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Considering silver as a plasma, I have taken the equation of motion for electrons in an electric field and found the resistivity to be

\sigma_{N}=\frac{Ne^{2}}{m_{e}(i\omega + \tau^{-1})}

The first part of the questions asks me to calculate the scattering time \tau at low frequencies. \sigma_{N} and N are provided. I did this by ignoring the imaginary part since the frequencies are small, and rearanging for \tau.

The next part, and the final part are what i am having trouble with.

NEXT PART

It asks at what frequency would i expect the resistivity to increase by a factor of 10.

Now, surely this should still be considered a low frequency, and if so the imaginary term vanishes in the conductivity equation above. However if this is considerd to now be a significant frequency, how would i solve the equation to obtain \omega, i know i would put in 10\sigma_{N} but how do i deal with the imaginary part?

FINAL PART

I am asked to comment on the phase difference between the current and the voltage along a silver wire at this frequency. Dont know where to start with this one...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


First of well, are you sure what you've calculated is resistivity? Because \sigma is the usual symbol for conductivity, whereas resistivity is \rho = 1/\sigma...

Anyway, instead of neglecting the imaginary term in the denominator entirely, you could write the resistivity in polar form, then figure out what frequency makes the magnitude of the resistivity increase by a factor of 10. Writing it in polar form would help you with the last part too ;-)
 


Given the following data on copper, how do i calculate the resistivity?

Relaxation time: 2.50e10-14s
Density: 8940Kgm-3
molar mass: 63.5g

is there an equation for it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K