Resistor Math Problem: Finding Equivalent Resistance in Series and Parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ithryndil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving two resistors connected in series and parallel, with given equivalent resistances of 744.7 Ω and 130.4 Ω, respectively. Participants are tasked with finding the individual resistances of the two resistors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss solving for one resistor in terms of the other and substituting into the equations for equivalent resistance. There is mention of using the quadratic formula to find solutions and concerns about potential errors in calculations or graphing.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed that the approach taken seems correct and that the quadratic equation should yield real solutions. There is an acknowledgment of a possible error in graphing or calculator input, but no consensus on the final values of the resistors has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific calculator models and tools that may assist in solving quadratic equations, indicating a reliance on technology for computation. There is also a reiteration of the original problem statement and equations used for series and parallel resistances.

Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two resistors connected in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω. When they are connected in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. Find the resistance of each resistor.
Ω (small resistance)
Ω (large resistance)


Homework Equations


Req = R1 + R2 for Series.
1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 for Parallel.



The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I began by solving one for R1 and plugging it into the other...

If I solve the first one I get R1 = Req - R2. Let's call Req, Reqs for Equivalent Resistance in series. Let's call Reqp the Equivalent Resistance in parallel.

So I plug into the other one:

1/Reqp = 1/ (Reqs - R2) + 1/R2

Messing around I am able to get:
R2Reqs - R2^2 = Reqs*Reqp However when I graph if there is no sign change... I've done it a few times so I don't think it's my algebra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try to solve the quadratic equation.
It seems OK to me. Actually I've solved it and it has two real solutions.
You did OK.
Good luck.
 


Hey,
yeah when i used quadratic eq. it seemed to work out fine.

I learned resistors with the equation (R1*R2)/(R1+R2) which is the same thing simplified, but i always find htis one easier.

Anyway, it seems like you just about had it, just needed to finish it off with the eq and you would have it.
 


Ithryndil said:

Homework Statement


Two resistors connected in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω. When they are connected in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. Find the resistance of each resistor.
Ω (small resistance)
Ω (large resistance)

Homework Equations


Req = R1 + R2 for Series.
1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 for Parallel.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I began by solving one for R1 and plugging it into the other...

If I solve the first one I get R1 = Req - R2. Let's call Req, Reqs for Equivalent Resistance in series. Let's call Reqp the Equivalent Resistance in parallel.

So I plug into the other one:

1/Reqp = 1/ (Reqs - R2) + 1/R2

Messing around I am able to get:
R2Reqs - R2^2 = Reqs*Reqp However when I graph if there is no sign change... I've done it a few times so I don't think it's my algebra.

Your equation is ok, but you need to solve the quadratic, and since the 4ac term is positive you should have a real result.
 


Bah, it must have been a stupid graphic error on my calculator. I knew I needed to solve the quadratic and must have just goofed when inputting on my calculator to graph and then find where it intersects y = 0. Thanks.
 


I'm guessing that by the way you are talking, you have either a TI-83, or maybe a more advanced. If you are only using an 83 or 84, which is what most people have, there's a very easy quadratic program that you can put in there, (like write yourself) so you don't even need a cord to hook it up to your PC. I made one for mine, and it really comes in handy, because not only its quicker, but then it lessens any stupid mistakes you might make, (like accidently not putting a negative, or having to deal with a window issue for graphing).

So this isn't the exact same as the one i made, but it definitely works, just might be one step more than needed. http://www.math.montana.edu/math105/QuadProg.html

Good luck!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
932
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K