Resistors in parallel and series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the equivalent resistance of a circuit with resistors arranged in both series and parallel configurations. Participants are exploring the relationships between resistors in these configurations and how to apply the relevant equations correctly.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the addition of resistors in series and parallel, with some attempting to clarify the definitions of these configurations. There are questions about the correct grouping of resistors and the calculations involved in finding the equivalent resistance.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants providing guidance and clarifications on the definitions of series and parallel resistors. Some participants have expressed understanding after receiving feedback, while others continue to seek clarity on specific calculations and configurations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the arrangement of resistors and the application of formulas, with participants questioning the assumptions made in their initial approaches. The presence of a diagram in the thread suggests that visual representation may play a role in understanding the problem.

warnexus
Messages
90
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


resistors-1.jpg

Homework Equations



resistors in series add

resistors in parallel add inversally. the denominator of the answer(which is the fraction) will be your answer

The Attempt at a Solution



I added annotations to show my thought process

this last part was a good tricky question. but here's was my thought process.

since i need to find the points between A and B I need to do arithmetic on the points between A and B which is all the numbers in ohms

1 and 3 and 6 and 2 are in series. 4 ,12, 5 and 20 are in parallel.

with that said, 1+3+6+2 = 12 ohms

4*12/(4+12) = 48/16 = 3
5*20/(5+20) 100/25 = 4

12+3+4 = 19 ohms but its wrong.

any guidance will be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
warnexus said:

Homework Statement


[ IMG]http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d86/warnexus/resistors-1.jpg[/PLAIN]

Homework Equations



resistors in series add

resistors in parallel add inversally. the denominator of the answer(which is the fraction) will be your answer

The Attempt at a Solution



I added annotations to show my thought process

this last part was a good tricky question. but here's was my thought process.

since i need to find the points between A and B I need to do arithmetic on the points between A and B which is all the numbers in ohms

1 and 3 and 6 and 2 are in series. 4 ,12, 5 and 20 are in parallel.

with that said, 1+3+6+2 = 12 ohms

4*12/(4+12) = 48/16 = 3
5*20/(5+20) 100/25 = 4

12+3+4 = 19 ohms but its wrong.

any guidance will be appreciated
The 1Ω and 3Ω are in series, but they're not in series with any other single resistor; certainly not in series with the 6Ω resistor.

Similarly, the 2Ω resistor is not in series with any other single resistor.What constitutes resistors being in parallel?

What constitutes resistors being in series?
 
SammyS said:
The 1Ω and 3Ω are in series, but they're not in series with any other single resistor; certainly not in series with the 6Ω resistor.

Similarly, the 2Ω resistor is not in series with any other single resistor.What constitutes resistors being in parallel?

What constitutes resistors being in series?

resistors in series if the components take on one path
resistors in parallel if the component are connected at each end but the component can take on multiple paths

2, 5, 20, 4 ,6 and 12 are in parallel. 1 and 3 are in series

thanks I understand now!
 
Last edited:
warnexus said:
resistors in series if the components take on one path
resistors in parallel if the component are connected at each end but the component can take on multiple paths
There's a bit more to it than that.
2, 5, 20, 4 ,6 and 12 are in parallel. 1 and 3 are in series
Mostly, that's incorrect. -- That's over simplified.


Since it's handy, let's look at the circuit in this problem for example.

First of all, we you are asked to find the equivalent resistance between points A & B . This could be done in a laboratory by placing a battery across A & B and measuring the voltage, V, across A & B as well as the current, I, passing through point A (or through point B -- same current either place.) Then use Ohm's Law: REq=V/I .

Current passing through point A has many possible paths it can take in order to finally arrive at point B. However, looking at the big picture, there are two main paths.
1. The path through point C, then through that mess of resistors, then through point D and finally through B.

2. The path through point E, then through that other mess of resistors, then through point F and finally through B.​
So, current entering this set of resistors can pass either through the leg with points C & D or pass through the leg with points E & F. No current passing through point C can get to B without first passing through D. Similarly, no current passing through point E can get to B without first passing through F.

So, the leg of the circuit from C to D is in parallel with the leg of the circuit from E to F.


The leg from E to F: 2Ω, 5Ω, & 20Ω resistors.
Any current from E that passes through the 2Ω resistor must then somehow pass through that combination of 5Ω, & 20Ω resistors before passing through F.

Any current passing through the 2Ω resistor then either passes through the 5Ω resistor or through the 20Ω resistor before going on to F. Therefore, the

So, the 5Ω & 20Ω resistors are in parallel.

In summary, the 2Ω resistor is in series with the parallel combination of the 5Ω & 20Ω resistors.​

The C D leg is a bit more complicated mainly due to the three resistors, the 4Ω, 6Ω, & 12Ω resistors. The three resistors are in parallel. Current arriving to left left of this trio can pass through anyone of the three before joining up & continuing on to point D.
 
the oversimplification got me the answer. =] but i do see where you are getting at. thanks for the guidance.
 
warnexus said:
the oversimplification got me the answer. =] but i do see where you are getting at. thanks for the guidance.
That's some coincidence.

How did you combine those values?


So, what did you get for the answer?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
936
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K