Resonance absorbtion of neutrons

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the resonance absorption of neutrons, specifically how the neutron flux and temperature affect neutron absorption rates in nuclear engineering contexts. Participants explore the implications of the flux spectrum and its relationship with temperature in resonance regions, touching on theoretical and practical aspects of neutron behavior in reactors.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how temperature affects the average neutron flux, suggesting that while flux is controlled, ambient temperature may influence neutron energy when tuned to specific values like 1 MeV.
  • Another participant clarifies that if "neutron temperature" is considered, it can indeed affect the neutron flux in the resonance region of the material.
  • A third participant elaborates on the general equation for absorption, emphasizing that the flux spectrum is influenced by factors such as fissile source, lattice design, and moderator type, rather than being solely controlled.
  • This participant also notes that resonance absorption occurs at energies above the thermal equilibrium of the moderator, with resonances broadened by atomic vibrations dependent on fuel temperature.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of flux shape near a resonance, explaining that the high resonance cross section can cause a dip in flux, which could lead to overestimating resonance absorption if a flat flux shape is assumed.
  • It is mentioned that while certain factors can be controlled in a reactor, the flux spectrum cannot be precisely controlled due to the complexities of the slowing down process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the control and influence of temperature and flux in resonance absorption, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the dependence of neutron behavior on various factors, including the moderator and fuel temperature, as well as the complexities of the neutron flux spectrum, which may not be fully resolved in the discussion.

oksuz_
Messages
70
Reaction score
3
Hi,

As you may know, the following equation gives the number of neutrons absorbed per cm3/sec in a resonance region.

Faav∫∑a(E) dE

So, it is said in Lamarsh, introduction to nuclear engineering, that Φav depends on temperature. I do not get this because I know that the flux is something we control. Or should we think just whenever we tune the flux, let's say 1 MeV, the ambient temperature affects its energy?

Thank you in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Temperature of what? If neutron temperature, then neutron flux in the resonance region of the material is affected.
 
oksuz_ said:
Fa=Φav∫∑a(E) dE
That's a general equation for absorption over dE.

oksuz_ said:
I do not get this because I know that the flux is something we control. Or should we think just whenever we tune the flux, let's say 1 MeV, the ambient temperature affects its energy?
The flux spectrum is determined by the fissile source, lattice design and moderator type and density. In an LWR, the neutrons are moderated by the coolant (light water), and it is with water, not the fuel, with which the neutrons are more or less in thermal equilibrium. Resonance absorption occurs at energies above the thermal equilibrium of the moderator. The resonances are broadened by the vibration of the atoms, primarily U-238 and Pu-240 (Pu-240 in irradiated fuel), and the vibration is dependent on fuel temperature, which is dependent on linear power and coolant temperature.
Typical neutron energy spectrum - https://www.researchgate.net/figure/259717796_fig2_Fig-2-Neutron-source-spectrum-from-typical-LWR-reactor

Fission neutrons are born with energies in the low MeV range (0.1 to 10 MeV), with a most probable energy slightly below 1 MeV, and a mean about 2 MeV. One should be able to find a fission neutron energy spectrum in Lamarsh.

See also - https://t2.lanl.gov/nis/publications/madland1.pdf
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: oksuz_
I believe you are referring to the flux shape near a resonance, and the bounds of the integral should be above and below the resonance.
The high resonance cross section will cause the flux to "dip" and you will get a lower flux corresponding to the peak of the cross section in the resonance.
If you assume a flat flux shape in the resonance region, you will over-estimate the resonance absorption.

It is not quite true that we "control" the flux. We can control certain things, like the fuel material, moderator material, and size of the materials, but we cannot control the flux spectrum with great accuracy. (At least in a reactor.) The flux spectrum will be a result of the slowing down process. I believe you are studying slowing down process by your question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K