Chemistry Resonance Structures for a Certain Molecule

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student's confusion regarding feedback from a teaching assistant (TA) on an exam question about resonance structures. The TA deducted one point but provided unclear comments, leading to frustration over the illegibility of the handwriting. Participants speculate that the TA's notes might refer to formal charges or the number of electrons in the structures. The student seeks clarification on the TA's feedback and requests assistance in understanding the correct answer. Overall, the thread highlights challenges in interpreting feedback and the importance of clear communication in academic evaluations.
alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Here attached is a question from my exam. My TA removed 1 point out of 7 for a reason. Can anyone decipher for what? There's the writing in red but it is illegible to me. I don't understand to what he refers by 8 and 6 t or +, or whatever he wrote.

http://imgur.com/igpyp8V

Or can anyone write a full answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
My guess on what he wrote is "bad all have fc (formal charge)". I hate it when the markers writing is illegible.
 
My reading is "but all have 8t". I don't know what t is but he has written 6t on some structures and 8t on others. :confused:
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top