Resource Request for Relativistic Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the interest in learning relativistic mechanics specifically for modeling gravitational equations of motion, with a background in vector calculus and PDEs. It highlights the necessity of understanding General Relativity, as equations of motion depend on solutions to the Einstein Field Equations, which are influenced by matter and energy distribution. Recommendations for resources include introductory textbooks and Sean Carroll's free online lecture notes. The conversation also touches on the effects of General Relativity on Mercury's orbit, noting that while the corrections are measurable, they are relatively small. Overall, a foundational understanding of General Relativity is essential for accurately modeling gravitational dynamics.
Al-Layth
Messages
21
Reaction score
4
I am aware of the Newtonian model of Gravitation and I am interested in Relativistic Mechanics.
I do not know anything about relativistic mechanics other than its more "accurate" at modelling gravitation and that it "reduces" to the classical formulation in some cases.

I only want to be able to use relativistic mechanics to be able to write and solve equations of motions under the influence of gravity, I am not very interested in the other parts of the theory itself.

Can someone recommend a resource so that I can learn to do this? thank you(my mathematical background is only up to vector calculus and PDEs. I am prepared to learn tensor calculus and differential geometry and anything else, though so don't constrain your recommendations out of concern for my lack of math knowledge as then I may not be able to do what I want, that is to use relativistic mechanics to mathematically model gravitation)
 
  • Sad
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
Al-Layth said:
I only want to be able to use relativistic mechanics to be able to write and solve equations of motions under the influence of gravity, I am not very interested in the other parts of the theory itself.
Unfortunately, the equations of motion under the influence of gravity unavoidably involve "the other parts of the theory" in General Relativity, which is the relativistic theory of gravity. The reason is that in order to even have equations of motion, you have to know which solution of the Einstein Field Equation you are using, and that will depend on the distribution of matter and energy that you want to model.

Al-Layth said:
Can someone recommend a resource so that I can learn to do this?
I would start with an introductory textbook on General Relativity. Sean Carroll's online lecture notes are available for free:

https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/grnotes/
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
Al-Layth said:
I only want to be able to use relativistic mechanics to be able to write and solve equations of motions under the influence of gravity, I am not very interested in the other parts of the theory itself.
Are you sure you need relativistic mechanics? What maximum speed are you interested in?
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier
anorlunda said:
Are you sure you need relativistic mechanics? What maximum speed are you interested in?
Mercury is heavily affected by effects due to general relativity despite having low speed
 
malawi_glenn said:
Mercury is heavily affected by effects due to general relativity
I'm not sure what you mean by "heavily affected". AFAIK the only GR correction to Newtonian behavior that is observable for Mercury is the extra perihelion precession, which is only 43 arc seconds per century. That's very small.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
PeterDonis said:
43 arc seconds per century
well I meant that it is measurable :)
 
  • Haha
Likes vanhees71
malawi_glenn said:
Mercury is heavily affected by effects due to general relativity despite having low speed
I read this half asleep and had a real space cadet moment. I thought you meant elemental Mercury.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and malawi_glenn
Mondayman said:
elemental Mercury
Which is pretty heavy. Ever hold a jar of it?

PeterDonis said:
extra perihelion precession
A lot of people don't know that the GR effect is only about 8% of the total perihelion advance.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71
The OP seems to have left the room.
 
  • #10
malawi_glenn said:
I meant that it is measurable :)
Ok, but "measurable" is a much weaker claim than "heavily affected". Please be careful in choosing your words.
 

Similar threads

Replies
39
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top