How large is the resultant force on Gavin's toy car after he kicks it?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The resultant force on Gavin's toy car, which weighs 1.2 kg and is kicked with a force of 2.4 N, is zero due to the absence of friction. Despite the applied force, the lack of opposing forces leads to a net force of zero, as confirmed by the discussion participants. The confusion arises from the interpretation of "resultant force" and the context of the problem, which emphasizes the importance of clear communication in physics terminology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Basic knowledge of force and mass concepts
  • Familiarity with resultant force calculations
  • Awareness of frictionless systems in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Newton's Second Law of Motion and its applications
  • Learn about frictionless motion and its implications in physics
  • Research the concept of resultant forces in various scenarios
  • Explore practical examples of force applications in everyday situations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching force concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion without friction.

Drizzy
Messages
210
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Gavin is kicking one of his toy cars with a force straight ahead. the car weighs 1.2 kg and has friction free wheels so that the friction forces of the car is small when it has started. Gavin kicks his car with the force of 2.4 N. How large is the resultant force?

Homework Equations


No equation

The Attempt at a Solution


If there is no friction then the resultant force should be pointing forward but my book is saying that the resultant force is zero. why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why don't you translate the problem into common English / Physics language so that all can understand it? Perhaps the verb "to crackle" means something non-obvious in this punk-speak dialect? And power certainly isn't measured in Newtons in any unit system that I'm aware of. So how are we to know what "resultant" or "force" really translate to?
 
gneill said:
Why don't you translate the problem into common English / Physics language so that all can understand it? Perhaps the verb "to crackle" means something non-obvious in this punk-speak dialect? And power certainly isn't measured in Newtons in any unit system that I'm aware of. So how are we to know what "resultant" or "force" really translate to?

lol I used google translate :P I have updated it now
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K