Resultant moment of beam fixed at one end

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the calculation of the resultant moment for a beam fixed at one end (point A) with a load applied at the opposite end (point B). The correct formula for the resultant moment about point A is sum(M) = FL, where F is the external force and L is the perpendicular distance from point A to the load. The reaction moment at the fixed end is not included in this calculation, as the resultant moment on the beam as a whole is zero for equilibrium. The term "resultant" is best reserved for cases involving distributed loads.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static equilibrium in structural mechanics
  • Familiarity with moment calculations in 2D systems
  • Knowledge of fixed beam boundary conditions
  • Basic principles of load application and reaction forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of static equilibrium in beams
  • Learn about distributed loads and their resultant forces
  • Explore the calculation of moments in 2D structural analysis
  • Investigate fixed and pinned beam supports and their effects on moment calculations
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in beam analysis and design will benefit from this discussion.

SubZer0
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Clarification of terminology
Hi all,

I just wanted to get some clarification on 'resultant moment' when calculated in 2D for a beam which is fixed at one end (point A), and has a load applied at the opposite end (point B). My interpretation of 'resultant moment' would be calculated as sum(M) = Ma + FL, where Ma is the reaction moment at the fixed end of the beam, F is the external force applied and L is the perpendicular distance between the applied load and point A. So in my understanding, the resultant moment about point A would simply be -FL, or the opposite of the sum of moments about point A.

Is this is a correct assumption?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Actually, thinking more about this, the resultant moment would simply be the sum of the moments about point A, and would not include the reaction moment at the fixed end. So above, the resultant moment would simply be sum(M)=FL.
 
SubZer0 said:
Summary: Clarification of terminology

Hi all,

I just wanted to get some clarification on 'resultant moment' when calculated in 2D for a beam which is fixed at one end (point A), and has a load applied at the opposite end (point B). My interpretation of 'resultant moment' would be calculated as sum(M) = Ma + FL, where Ma is the reaction moment at the fixed end of the beam, F is the external force applied and L is the perpendicular distance between the applied load and point A. So in my understanding, the resultant moment about point A would simply be -FL, or the opposite of the sum of moments about point A.

Is this is a correct assumption?

Thanks!
It depends on what you mean by resultant moment. The resultant moment of the applied force about A is +FL. The resultant fixed end moment is -FL. The resultant moment on the beam as a whole is 0, for equilibrium. The term resultant is usually used when there is a distributed load and you want to find its resultant acting as a point load. Otherwise it may be best to stay away from that term and consider moments and forces separately in the x and y directions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K