Results of last year's CDT prediction poll

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poll Prediction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the results of a prediction poll regarding whether Loll's team would extend the sum-over-topologies result from 2D to 3D and 4D. Out of 12 participants, Hans de Vries and Kea accurately predicted that Loll's group would not achieve this extension within a reasonable timeframe. The discussion highlights the stagnation in progress on topology change in causal dynamical triangulation (CDT) over the past 10 months, confirming the accuracy of their predictions. Additionally, it notes that a different group of participants won another prediction poll, with Spin Network being the only individual to win both polls despite being banned from the forum.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of causal dynamical triangulation (CDT)
  • Familiarity with the concept of topology in physics
  • Knowledge of prediction polling methodologies
  • Awareness of recent developments in theoretical physics research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the latest findings in causal dynamical triangulation (CDT) and topology change
  • Examine the implications of the sum-over-topologies problem in theoretical physics
  • Explore methodologies for conducting prediction polls in scientific communities
  • Review the recent CDT survey paper referenced in the discussion for deeper insights
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum gravity, and participants in scientific prediction polls who seek to understand the dynamics of forecasting outcomes in complex scientific problems.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
the results in this case are very simple. Over a dozen of us guessed
as to whether (understood "in a reasonable time") Loll's team would be able to extend the sum-over-topologies result from 2D to 3D and ultimately to 4D.

Of the 12 people who registered a forecast, and are still forum members, two got it right: Hans de Vries and Kea.

they said Loll's group would not be able to extend the results, even to 3D.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81626

In the most recent CDT survey paper this is discussed a little. some reasons for the stubborn resistance of the problem are mentioned. It has been 10 months since the last paper on toplogy change in CDT and no sign progress. for all practical purposes, as I see it, it has been a reasonable time to wait and Hans and Kea predicted right.

==================

It may be of some consolation to others that a completely different bunch of people won the OTHER prediction poll we had last year that we have results for
https://www.physicsforums.com/poll.php?do=showresults&pollid=580
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=81739

In that case 14 or so guessed who are still around and the winners (whose names I recognize)
were Chronos, Notevenwrong, Gokul, and Ohwilleke.

there is one odd thing. the only person who won both polls was someone who I think was banned from PF! His tag is Spin Network. I have not been counting him because he is no longer a member. But from the limited evidence available I would consider him an inspired guesser.

==================
a recent CDT survey is here
http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0604212
see page 4 and references there for discussion of the recalcitrant "sum over topologies" problem
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like Hans de Vries and Kea were right in their prediction that Loll's team would not be able to extend the results, even to 3D, within a reasonable timeframe. It is interesting that the only person who won both predictions was someone who has since been banned from the forum. It is a testament to his investigative skills that he was able to make such accurate guesses on two different topics.
 

Similar threads

  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 124 ·
5
Replies
124
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K