Resume Question - Where/What to put for research experience

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around how to effectively present research experience on a resume, particularly in the context of applying for jobs in scientific fields. Participants explore various ways to categorize and describe this experience, considering its significance and the expectations of potential employers.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests listing research experience under the 'Work Experience' section, particularly for science-related positions, indicating that this is a sensible approach.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the categorization of research experience depends on the job being applied for, proposing that it could also be considered a project if the applicant led the research.
  • A different viewpoint stresses the importance of detailing accomplishments rather than responsibilities, arguing that vague descriptions do not effectively communicate the applicant's contributions.
  • Participants discuss the potential value of including published research, suggesting that mentioning publications could enhance the resume's impact.
  • Concerns are raised about the clarity of the descriptions provided, with suggestions to specify the methods used in data analysis to better convey the applicant's role and skills.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that research experience should be included in the resume, but there is no consensus on the best way to categorize it or how to describe the contributions effectively. Multiple competing views on the significance of detail and context remain present.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of specific job contexts for which the resume is being tailored, as well as varying expectations among employers regarding the presentation of research experience.

MPKU
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
I've done research with a professor at my university and I am curious what to put on my resume for this experience. Do I list it as a job, skills, or campus involvement?

Currently I have this listened under my 'Work Experience' section:

Research Assistant, Kutztown University
• Assisted Dr. ------ in researching a vibrational granular system
• Measured and analyzed data
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what kind of job you are applying for, but generally speaking, the work experience section would be a sensible place to put it. If you are applying for a position in science, the way you have done it seems fine.
 
All depends on the job. I also have research experience on my resume. I listed it in the jobs section followed by a description of the details of the job. You may also want to consider it a project if you were leading the research and your professor was simply watching you. What you have now seems like a good start, but I would try to provide a little more details on the type of job you completed. I.e, "successfully analyzed data in order to establish a new vibration granular system" If your research was published, I would mention that in your resume along with a potential link to the paper or the title, publisher, etc. I would just try to emphasize how important your work was and how it relates to the job. Hope this helps! Best of luck.
 
That is work experience, for sure. You could list it as part of your "education", but that would make it seem less important.

Make the bullet points about the accomplishments you had during the research experience, not what your responsibilities were. "Assisted Dr. ----" sounds very vague, and it's not clear what you actually did. Did you write code for him? Did you operate or construct equipment for him? Maybe you spent most of your time fetching coffee for him, how would an employer know that wasn't the case? "Measured and Analyzed data" is slightly better, but it doesn't say how you did it. Did you write the code to analyze the data? or did you just brainlessly run a script to do it?

For one, an employer may ask these kinds of questions during an interview. It's unlikely that they'll quite so blunt, but they will ask you to clarify things you wrote in your resume. They're also more likely to be impressed if they actually know what you accomplished, even if it wasn't that significant. I say ditch the first bullet point, and expand the second one.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K