Retraction in surface of genus g

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForMyThunder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
ForMyThunder
Messages
149
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In the surface Mg of genus g, let C be a circle that separates Mh' and Mk' obtained from the closed surfaces Mh and Mk by deleting an open disk from each. Show that Mh' does not retract onto its boundary circle C, and hence Mg does not retract onto C.

Hatcher Allen. Algebraic Topology Section 1.2 Problem 9


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

Suppose there was such a retraction. Then we would have that [tex]i_*:\pi_1(C)\to\pi_1(M'_h)[/tex] induced by the inclusion map is injective and that [tex]\phi:\pi_1(M'_h)\to\pi_1(M_h)[/tex] is surjective with kernel [itex]i_*(\pi_1(C))[/itex]. Thus, [tex]\pi_1(M'_h)/i_*(\pi_1(C))\cong \pi_1(M_h)[/tex] and by taking the abelianizations: [tex]\mathbb{Z}^{2h-1}\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2h}/\mathbb{Z}\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2h}[/tex] yielding a contradiction.

Is this correct? I used the assumption that C was a retract of Mh' to say that the fundamental group of C is isomorphic to a subgroup of the fundamental group of Mh'.
 
on Phys.org
Actually, in that last line, [itex]\mathbb{Z}^{2h-1}\cong\mathbb{Z}^{2h}/\mathbb{Z}[/itex] is not necessarily true. But the second isomorphism in that line is implied by the previous line and this leads to the contradiction.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 137 ·
5
Replies
137
Views
21K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
14K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
17K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
14K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K