Review of Local Hidden Variable Theories

In summary, Marco Genovese has published a review of recent progresses in the research on hidden variable theories. The paper discusses the transition from a deterministic view of nature to the probabilistic view of quantum mechanics, which is still debated. While the physics community has largely accepted this paradigm, it has not been widely assimilated in culture. The paper also mentions the lack of conclusive experiments to falsify local realism, with various experiments showing indications in favor of standard quantum mechanics but with low detection efficiencies leading to additional assumptions. However, significant progress has been made in the last ten years and it is believed that an ultimate experiment could soon be performed. The paper also notes that the discussion on this topic involves methodological questions and that even if local realism is
  • #1
DrChinese
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,131
1,878
Marco Genovese has put out a review that fairly well summarizes where things are at in tests of Bell's Theorem. He has done similar papers previously, and the references are quite comprehensive (there are 505, and they cover the spectrum).

Research on Hidden Variable Theories: a review of recent progresses

An except:

The transition from the XIX century point of view of a perfectly deterministic nature described by classical mechanics to the actual quantum mechanical point of view of a probabilistic world has been difficult and largely debated and still many points at the very foundations of quantum mechanics need a clarification. It should also be noticed that whilst this new paradigm has been largely accepted by physicists community, its assimilation in diffused culture is still rather limited.

Furthermore, as we have seen, a conclusive experiment falsifying in an absolutely uncontroversial way local realism is still missing.

More in details, for what concerns local hidden variable theories, since Bell theorem it is known that a general answer about their validity can be given by an experiment. In the last 40 years various experiments have addressed this problem: strong indications favouring standard quantum mechanics have been obtained, but no conclusive experiment has yet been performed, mainly due to low detection efficiencies that demand for additional assumptions.

Nevertheless, relevant progresses toward this goal have been made in the last ten years and in my opinion an ultimate experiment could not be far in the future.

However, we have to acknowledge that this personal opinion is not generally shared: on one side some authors deem that the large amount of experimental data disfavouring Local Hidden Variable Theories is already largely sufficient for excluding them, on the other side other authors (see for example [505]) claim that the lack of a conclusive experiment after 40 years and in particular the ”resistance” of detection loophole to be eliminated could point out a practical impossibility of falsifying local realism. These discussion largely involve methodological questions [475,476,477,478] which are amply beyond the purposes of this paper.

Even if Local Realistic Theorem will be excluded by an ultimate Bell inequalities experiment, non-local hidden variable theory will still remain a possible alternative to standard quantum mechanics. Following the discussion of last sections, in our opinion a large space still remains for relevant contributions to study this possibility both from a theoretical and an experimental point of view.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
DrChinese said:
Even if Local Realistic Theorem will be excluded by an ultimate Bell inequalities experiment, non-local hidden variable theory will still remain a possible alternative to standard quantum mechanics. Following the discussion of last sections, in our opinion a large space still remains for relevant contributions to study this possibility both from a theoretical and an experimental point of view.

You should have said non-locally causal hidden variable theories ...
The diffusion equation is perfectly local, albeit ``signals'' can go faster than the speed of light in vacuum.
 
  • #3


I appreciate Marco Genovese's thorough review of recent progress in testing Bell's Theorem and the validity of local hidden variable theories. It is clear from the extensive references that this is a complex and ongoing topic of research that demands careful consideration and analysis.

I agree with Genovese's assessment that while there have been significant advancements in experimental techniques and data collection, there is still no conclusive experiment that can definitively prove or disprove local realism. However, I am optimistic about the potential for future experiments to provide a more definitive answer.

I also appreciate Genovese's acknowledgement of the ongoing debate and differing opinions within the scientific community on the validity of local hidden variable theories and their potential implications for our understanding of quantum mechanics. As he mentions, this is a topic that involves not only experimental evidence but also methodological considerations that may require further exploration.

In conclusion, I believe that Genovese's review highlights the importance of continued research and experimentation in this area to fully understand the foundations of quantum mechanics. I look forward to seeing future advancements and discoveries in this field.
 

1. What is a local hidden variable theory?

A local hidden variable theory is a type of theoretical framework that attempts to explain certain phenomena in quantum mechanics by proposing the existence of hidden variables at the local level. These variables are believed to determine the outcomes of measurements made in quantum systems, and they are assumed to be independent of each other and the measurement process. This theory was proposed as an alternative to the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, which suggests that particles do not have definite properties until they are measured.

2. What are the key principles of local hidden variable theories?

The key principles of local hidden variable theories include the assumption of determinism, which states that the behavior of particles can be predicted with certainty based on the values of the hidden variables; the principle of locality, which suggests that the hidden variables are independent of each other and do not have any instantaneous influence on each other; and the requirement of counterfactual definiteness, which proposes that all physical quantities have well-defined values even if they are not being measured.

3. What evidence supports or refutes local hidden variable theories?

There have been several experiments and thought experiments conducted to test the predictions of local hidden variable theories. One of the most well-known is the Bell inequality test, which has consistently shown violations of local hidden variable theories, indicating that they cannot fully explain the behavior of quantum systems. Other evidence includes the results of the double-slit experiment and the violation of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.

4. Are there any notable proponents of local hidden variable theories?

Yes, there have been several notable scientists who have proposed or supported local hidden variable theories, including Albert Einstein, David Bohm, and Louis de Broglie. However, their ideas have been largely rejected by the scientific community due to the overwhelming evidence against local hidden variable theories.

5. What are the implications of local hidden variable theories for our understanding of quantum mechanics?

If local hidden variable theories were to be proven correct, it would require a significant shift in our understanding of quantum mechanics. It would suggest that particles do have definite properties, which could potentially have practical applications in fields such as cryptography. However, the majority of evidence and scientific consensus currently support the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, which does not involve hidden variables.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
80
Views
4K
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
2
Replies
37
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
898
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top