Revolutionary Solution for Global Warming: Pumping Excess Water into Space!

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proposed solutions for global warming, particularly the idea of pumping excess water from the Earth's atmosphere into space. Participants explore various methods for addressing climate change, including technological and biological approaches, while also considering the implications and feasibility of these solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest pumping excess atmospheric water into space as a potential solution to global warming.
  • Others argue that building a pipe into space is currently unfeasible due to technological limitations.
  • Concerns are raised about the vast energy requirements needed to condense and pump water out of the atmosphere.
  • Some participants note that reducing atmospheric moisture could have negative consequences, such as decreased rainfall.
  • A proposal is made to bioengineer algae to absorb CO2, with some expressing skepticism about the feasibility and potential negative consequences of this approach.
  • One participant mentions the idea of adding aluminum oxide powder to jet fuel to reduce incoming solar radiation as a radical but potentially justified solution.
  • Another participant emphasizes the importance of reducing consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, while acknowledging that it may not be sufficient alone.
  • Concerns are raised about the unintended consequences of using aluminum oxide, particularly regarding ocean acidification and jet emissions.
  • Some participants highlight the complexity of the water cycle and the self-limiting nature of water vapor in the atmosphere.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the feasibility and implications of the proposed solutions, with no consensus reached on any particular approach. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness and practicality of the ideas presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the current technological capabilities to implement proposed solutions, the energy requirements for such actions, and the potential ecological impacts of various interventions. The discussion also reflects differing opinions on the urgency and nature of climate change responses.

  • #31
Here's a fun chart.

http://www.eclipptv.com/files/photos/05f971b5ec196b8L.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #32
While that's undoubtedly a cute chart, it's extraordinarily misleading. Let's look at a more detailed chart compiled from several sources:

1000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png


From here

This image is a comparison of 10 different published reconstructions of mean temperature changes during the last 1000 years. More recent reconstructions are plotted towards the front and in redder colors, older reconstructions appear towards the back and in bluer colors. An instrumental history of temperature is also shown in black. The medieval warm period and little ice age are labeled at roughly the times when they are historically believed to occur, though it is still disputed whether these were truly global or only regional events. The single, unsmoothed annual value for 2004 is also shown for comparison.
 
  • #33
I'm afraid neither one of those charts are valid. Since this is no longer a discussion of the topic, thread closed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K