RF Engineer from China Give Advice

[yangman]

Hello. Yangman here. I come here write an advice. Do not study digital field in EE. Every day I meet some digital circuit chump who call himself engineer because he understand AND NOR NAND NOR and verilog. Just because you can make LED blink on Arduino do not make you real engineer.

I give an advice that you should study E&M and RF-circuit design. It will put a hair on your chest and make a real man of you, because the math is complex. And you will become a real engineer.

Yangman

 

[sophiecentaur]

My chest must be well hairy!

 

[yungman]

Do I have a twin in China? I am Yungman and I feel exactly the same way as you can see from all the posts I posted!

Digital electronics, embedded, FPGA and even firmware are dime a dozen. If I could be promoted to an engineer within two year I started learning electronics, successfully designed a micro processor control system using 8085 and wrote a lot of the application programs using assembly language. This cannot be hard and is dime a dozen!

A lot of the EE student avoid EM at all cost, barely get through it and take the easy way out. There are just so many of those "hardware" engineer around.

As speed goes up, everything is analog, RF and EM. That's why there is a new category of engineer called "Signal Integrity Engineer" in the last 10 years to HELP those digital engineer to fix their mistake on their layout. I know, I work like a signal integrity engineer for a while and even contracted with KLA to layout their dense CCD board.

One more thing and that is very important. You think you can get away easy, problem is things change so fast in digital world, you have to constantly study and update your knowledge. Look at Firewire, it was so "in" 10 years ago. You waste time studying all the protocol, it's pretty much gone, USB took over. You spent time study up on one particular IC, then it get replaced. It is a constant thing. It is ok when you are young, wait until you get into 40s, have a family and your brain start lapsing! Constantly trying to keep up can be hard. Not to mention there are plenty of young digital engineer full of energy nipping at your behind to replace you!

Analog and RF don't change, it is very hard to get in, but once you are in, things don't change nearly as fast. Particular important is to learn transistor design. From my experience, IC design is mainly transistor design. It is just on a wafer, you just need to learn the limitation of the design on wafer.

 

[jim hardy]

""Analog and RF don't change, it is very hard to get in, but once you are in, things don't change nearly as fast. Particular important is to learn transistor design. From my experience, IC design is mainly transistor design. It is just on a wafer, you just need to learn the limitation of the design on wafer. ""

indeed, if one doesn't know what's just inside the pins of the 'chip' one will make mistakes interfacing to it.


pay attention to detail. Beware of 'engineers' who want to speak only in terms of "big picture" - in my book that's impressionism which as Bouguereau said is "an excuse to paint not very well".

 

[sophiecentaur]

You are so right. No one seems to want to do any sums either. If they can't use an simulation, they don't want to discuss what a circuit will do. You can't burn your fingers on a simulated resistor.

 

[yungman]

Until RF where Smith Chart become important, I never even use simulation, never learn PSpice. You really have to go through the circuit enough to get the feel of the circuits...to give you intuition and learn how to think as the circuit. Simulation take away all these.

Even with RF, when I do simulation with Microwave Office, I always draw out my own Smith Chart first. Then I spend a lot of time varying components and get the feel of how the graph goes how each component value change the graph, spent hours on this.

 

[phinds]

Hello. Yangman here. I come here write an advice. Do not study digital field in EE. Every day I meet some digital circuit chump who call himself engineer because he understand AND NOR NAND NOR and verilog. Just because you can make LED blink on Arduino do not make you real engineer.

I give an advice that you should study E&M and RF-circuit design. It will put a hair on your chest and make a real man of you, because the math is complex. And you will become a real engineer.

Yangman

So I take it you don't want anyone to be designing computers or any other digital electronics, huh? Sounds like a really bad idea to me.

 

[yungman]

I think you can learn designing digital on the fly. It don't not really deserve to be a 4 years degree. Button down and pay the piper, learn the math, EM and analog design so people will not come out ignorant about these. Believe me, I've seen enough engineers that don't know anything about these subjects. You learn digital stuff in like months, not years like RF, EM etc. And particular not that digital speed is getting so high and everything is RF.

You seen digital engineers that are literally blind about real electronics. I sure seen a lot.

You read digital books? They are really dumb down! Any Joe Blow can understand those books. Get a book on one of the major, spend 3 months going through the data sheet and application notes and programming development tools, you'll be the expert of that processor. Try learning PLL etc., you'll find you need to study 4 to 5 semesters of Calculus to get to LaPlace Transform and all to even get started. Ask Jim Hardy, he is very good with Laplace transform and closed loop control. He know RF from amateur radio, he can pickup PLL design in no time. Just has to learn the specifics of PLL like lockin range, pull in etc.

Bottom line, if you pay the piper and learn the real thing, you can always learn those easy stuff. If you take the easy route, it will be very hard if not impossible to go back into the real electronics. I have been doing both, I don't think the digital, firmware, FPGA can hold candle to the real electronics. It took me 3 weeks to learn programming FPGA and become the chief FPGA designer! Just like learning a computer language and the compiler! You learn one software language, you learn the second language in two weeks!

I have been using the learn as needed attitude all these years and honestly, towards the end, I took out all the experience in the digital design like USB and Firewire from my resume.

For the young people, don't take the easy way out, do all the math, pay the piper. Once you are over a certain age, you just cannot remember as well and if you find you need it later, it is more than twice as hard to learn.

 

[sophiecentaur]

@yangman
I can see you have been rattled by this bit it has to be said that many beginners in EE tend gravitate to the quick and easy way in, with elementary logic circuits and simulations. They then seem to think they 'know' all about EE.

 

[yangman]

There is something to be said for following your interests rather than whatever path may be perceived as "hardest".

And let's not forget that the greatest job opportunities are projected to be in software engineering, and you can learn java in 2 days.

 

[sophiecentaur]

There is something to be said for following your interests rather than whatever path may be perceived as "hardest".

And let's not forget that the greatest job opportunities are projected to be in software engineering, and you can learn java in 2 days.

Learn it or be able to earn good money with it? Companies can employ youngsters on peanuts for simple programming jobs. If you're good then you'll succede at anthing of course but I wonder whether early success will mean good carreer prospects. High ability plus hard work are needed whatever you want to do. Analogue ability is extremely portable and futureproof.

 

[jim hardy]

It is the malady of our age that the young are so busy teaching us that they have no time left to learn.
Eric Hoffer

i've been there.

there is a valid point in this - get your math and physics under yor belt while you're young.
Hardly anybody goes back to school for them in mid-life.
As British mathematician G H Hardy observed, "Math is a young man's game".

In times of change learners inherit the earth; while the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with a world that no longer exists.
Eric Hoffer

 

[sophiecentaur]

Quote"When I was a boy of fourteen, my father was so ignorant I could hardly stand to have the old man around. But when I got to be twenty-one, I was astonished at how much the old man had learned in seven years. " Mark Twain

 

[sophiecentaur]

Politeness is a rare quality in some cultures.

 

[yungman]

I am actually speaking from my life experience. I never have formal electronics education, all the analog electronics that I know were from self studying. In 1979, I attended Heald College for 3 semesters of digital electronics while I was working, I got good in digital and got promoted to become an engineer in 1980. Then I jointed LeCroy and designed a 8085 based control system and wrote a lot of the programs. Thanks to the owner Walter LeCroy taking me under his wing to develop a new project that I got my first taste of high speed analog design. I worked 80 hours week, learning analog electronics and work at the same time. Then I change jobs to Exar to design analog ICs.

When in 1985, I change jobs to Seimen Medical Div. Designing ultra sound scanner. I was so surprised all the 8085 stuffs were gone, I design the CPU control board using 68000 16 bits processor. Everything was different. That was the first time I realize the digital world is so volatile, if you are out for two years, you are out! I since moved myself to the analog group and concentrated on designing the front end low noise circuits.

All these year, I really don't have much formal knowledge. I only had equivalent of one and half semester of Calculus, no EM. Everything I know was learned on the job. It was not until 2000 when I finally decided to go back and study on my own. I since study math all the way to PDE, EM, RF etc.

I can tell you at my old age, it is so much harder to study. I can study, wrote down in the note book to make sure I understand, derive all the formula beyond the books called for...Then two weeks later when I go back and read my notes, it looks foreign to me...did I even wrote all these! I had a good memory when I was young, not quite photographic memory, but even in my upper division Chemistry class, I usually read slowly, think through it once or twice and I got A's in my test. Now, it's like going in one way and leak out at the other end! You cannot beat the age. I spend a little over 4 years to study all the math and EM now, that is so slow! I had to study 4 or 5 times to really sink in! It has be very frustrating that I just cannot remember things. At the beginning, I just use the excuse that I self study so must take more time as I have no instructor to go to. But this excuse got lame fast! 4 years to study 6 classes, that is slow. I have a lot of passion in electronics already, can you imagine if you have to study under the gun...so to speak.

Can you imagine if you are in a field that constantly changing. Yes, it might be easy to get into the field, but you have to spend the rest of your life chasing newer knowledge. Imagine when you are in the 40s and 50s, you have your family, your mind is failing and you have to compete with the young people that are single and have a good mind and have more updated knowledge. If you took the easy way in school and avoided all the difficult stuff, now you find the younger people nipping at your behind wanting to take over your job?

That is the main reason I keep talking about this, I have seen people loosing their jobs in digital and firmware field. If you are out for a year or two, you are out! Analog don't change as fast particularly as digital speed getting faster and faster, it become analog.

 

[yungman]

Politeness is a rare quality in some cultures.

That is the reason I was offended as I am a Chinese too and make me look bad. Most Chinese are not like this and I don't want people to have an impression that this is how we are. One bad apple don't make the whole group bad. Chinese people tend to be more humble, I am actually the rare loud one already!

 

[sophiecentaur]

I have a feeling that what you have said makes 'unacceptably good sense'.
Without some depth of analogue expertise and experience in a design team, they will make all the same old mistakes that were made and learned about back in the 50s and 60s.

 

[mdjensen22]

Can you imagine if you are in a field that constantly changing. Yes, it might be easy to get into the field, but you have to spend the rest of your life chasing newer knowledge. Imagine when you are in the 40s and 50s, you have your family, your mind is failing and you have to compete with the young people that are single and have a good mind and have more updated knowledge. If you took the easy way in school and avoided all the difficult stuff, now you find the younger people nipping at your behind wanting to take over your job?

That is the main reason I keep talking about this, I have seen people loosing their jobs in digital and firmware field. If you are out for a year or two, you are out! Analog don't change as fast particularly as digital speed getting faster and faster, it become analog.

Learning Embedded system is very easy, just download the data sheet and study it. You get the instruction set, the pin out, the timing requirement. Everything is in there.

This kind of thing, you learn one, you learn all. In my days, I learned the 8085 8 bit processor, since I design the mother board for 68000, HC11 and an Analog Decvices with 8051 core and both contain ADC and DAC and RAM and all. You learn one, you know how to design all. You survive EM class, this is cake walk.

Somewhat contradictory statements...no?

Edit:
That being said, I don't disagree that RF/Analog knowledge is important to good engineering. While I do a lot of work in the embedded realm, I do well with analog & RF as well. This helps designs meet EMC requirements the first try.

 

[yangman]

I am very happy for Yungman that he has found a field he is happy in.
But engineers who focus on the digital aspects are not all doomed failures, or uneducated slackers. They still are "real engineers" who are worthy of respect!

Not everyone wants to learn one topic and do the same thing for 40 years...

And, to the other guy, the average software engineers salary is higher than EE right now. The job market dictates salary much more than barrier of entry. For example, memorizing the dictionary is very difficult, but how much can you expect to make with that skill?

 

[yungman]

Somewhat contradictory statements...no?

Edit:
That being said, I don't disagree that RF/Analog knowledge is important to good engineering. While I do a lot of work in the embedded realm, I do well with analog & RF as well. This helps designs meet EMC requirements the first try.

Learning one is easy, but if you have to keep learning one after the other constantly is hard. It is not the concept that is hard, it's that each different type has totally different protocode, like Firewire and USB, even though they are serial communication, it is not hard to learn, but if you get down to programming the registers, it is very specific on the bit map, programming sequence, and over all, the layers are different. You have to go through the pain of adapting your mind set to each type.

I am sure the architecture of different processors have similarities, but they are different enough you have to constantly spent the effort to adapt to the new architectures.

Usually the life cycle of digital products are very short, so you are constantly under the gun to produce new product and the jobs are usually high pressure. From my experience, analog and RF jobs are never as high pressure.

If you design embedded system you should know what I mean. Take for example, The last embedded processor I designed was the Analog Devices ADuC831( if I remember correctly) that is 8051 core with dual DAC and muxed ADC and USB control. Even if you use 8051 before, you still have to go through tens of pages learning how to program the ADC and DAC and other functional blocks. Then you have to learn the development system and all the detail stuff. You go to another family, it is all over again. Of cause you have to take a lot of time learning USB. If some other communication link get popular, you have to learn it all over again. Just like if you are expert on Firewire, now it is all but disappeared, replaced by USB, Firewire chipset were dominated by Ti and USB is by Cypress, so the architecture are so different. It is an endless cycle.

 

[yungman]

I am very happy for Yungman that he has found a field he is happy in.
But engineers who focus on the digital aspects are not all doomed failures, or uneducated slackers. They still are "real engineers" who are worthy of respect!

Not everyone wants to learn one topic and do the same thing for 40 years...

And, to the other guy, the average software engineers salary is higher than EE right now. The job market dictates salary much more than barrier of entry. For example, memorizing the dictionary is very difficult, but how much can you expect to make with that skill?

You are looking at China point of view. Software is the easiest to outsource so you get more jobs over there. We loss most of the software jobs in the last 10 years. But we never loss the real electronics job that bad. But the trend is reversing. As you salary goes up, and to be blunt, China don't have the Creativity as in US. Jobs are starting to move back because it does not work out as well outsourcing to China and India. Quality is just not the same as many companies here learn. So you should not count your eggs too soon.

To take this farther away and look at the macro point of view. The reason all the invention are from US because of the freedom of expression, freedom to create. That's the reason US is always to creator. In an oppressed nation, people are not allow to think, to express, to think out of the box. They can be a very good copier, but seldom can breakout. I came from Hong Kong and I was taught to copy. It was not until I came over here then I open my eyes. I was a musician before and was popular in Hong Kong. Then I came over here, I compare the recording from when I was in Hong Kong and after I came here. It is very different, it's the freedom to create, to express that make the day and night difference.

 

[yangman]

Interesting...I have family in USA who told me there are LOTS of software jobs over there, because of the boom in social media and mobile devices. Especially in silicon valley. The salaries for software are higher than hardware by ~10k, even though there is a much lower barrier to entry. Sure, it is easier to outsource programmers, but the dramatic growth of that sector compensates for it. And from my understanding, the job market for hardware/electronics people is stagnating.

That is what i mean when I say, that salaries and job opportunities are not directly linked to difficulty and barrier of entry. The job market itself should be looked at carefully.

And, if I am happiest as a digital designer, I will go further in my career than if I am doing analog but hate my job...

 

[phinds]

And, if I am happiest as a digital designer, I will go further in my career than if I am doing analog but hate my job...

Well said. I have known a few well-paid miserable people who would have done well to have had your attitude.

 

[sophiecentaur]

And, to the other guy, the average software engineers salary is higher than EE right now. The job market dictates salary much more than barrier of entry. For example, memorizing the dictionary is very difficult, but how much can you expect to make with that skill?

It may depend on what sort of job you refer to. If it's the sort of job that only requires a level of Java, "learned in two days" then I don't know what employer would pay anything but peanuts. However, if you're talking of a serious Software Engineer then anyone worth the name 'Engineer' can earn a lot. A lot of bread and butter programmers and Web 'developers' really don't earn much money at all.

I wonder if you're being a tad defensive about a comment that I don't think was actually aimed at you, as you probably are operating at a much higher level than the target of the comment. Reading through the many posts on this Forum, I get the same impression as yungman: there are many people with a smattering of digital design or are familiar with simulations of analogue circuits, who seem to feel they know enough. There are a lot fewer who demonstrate a safe level of knowledge of analogue and RF systems.

I don't think this thread is going to get much further.

[Edit] But I agree that a job you like is worth a lot. Stick with it.

 

[yungman]

I am not familiar with software and programming. I am guessing that the money maker are the ones that has strong background in Physics and Math. If it is just programming, it is easy, a program like C++ is nothing more than a tool, a means to the end. All I know is the few that worked in the spectrometer company I worked in really have to know advance math and physics. All the electrostatic lens need to be programmed that you have to know Electrodynamics and Calculus to do the programming. Like signal processing type of programming, I know they need to know Fourier Transform very well. I think those are the ones that earn the big bucks because not that many people can fill the shoes.

This is just a guessing as I worked with some of them that are quite bright.

 

[Averagesupernova]

Yungman, you just don't seem to get it. A person could easily say that ANYTHING is a means to an end. Calculus is a tool for instance. Just like you say the language C++ is a tool. You sound like a guy I used to work with who could not get along with a certain EE who's job was concentrated on firmware. It was the firmware guy vs. the RF guy. I soon learned that neither one knew what they were talking about. Don't get me wrong, I am not taking sides and saying the engineers who focus on digital are smarter or anything like that. Most everything used in engineering is a tool.
-
It's all a perspective. I once heard a very stupid person say: "An SUV is such a worthless vehicle. It's a step between a car with good handling and a truck with the ability to haul something significant neither of which it can do well." My response to that could be: "A car is such a worthless vehicle. It's a step between a motorcycle with excellent manuverabilty and a SUV which has good off-road abilities. Of course the car can do neither very well, comparably."

 

[yungman]

Yungman, you just don't seem to get it. A person could easily say that ANYTHING is a means to an end. Calculus is a tool for instance. Just like you say the language C++ is a tool. You sound like a guy I used to work with who could not get along with a certain EE who's job was concentrated on firmware. It was the firmware guy vs. the RF guy. I soon learned that neither one knew what they were talking about. Don't get me wrong, I am not taking sides and saying the engineers who focus on digital are smarter or anything like that. Most everything used in engineering is a tool.
-
It's all a perspective. I once heard a very stupid person say: "An SUV is such a worthless vehicle. It's a step between a car with good handling and a truck with the ability to haul something significant neither of which it can do well." My response to that could be: "A car is such a worthless vehicle. It's a step between a motorcycle with excellent manuverabilty and a SUV which has good off-road abilities. Of course the car can do neither very well, comparably."

Did you read the entire thread? It has nothing to do with which job is better and nothing to do with how much money you earn. I am sure if you know a brand new technology that few people know a the time, you can demand big money. Just like my sister know Pearl?? programming and she got good wages about 14 or 15 years ago. But soon as there are more people or a newer program comes out, you become expandable. It is about people should bite the bullet and work hard to cover the more difficult part of the EE rather than taking the easy way out. It is about you learn the difficult one and is easy to turn around and learn the easy one because you have a good foundation. But if you take the easy way out, then it would be hard to turn around. And as the speed of digital circuit get faster and faster, it all become analog.

Are you a digital engineer? I have seen so many digital engineer getting stuck and need help when working on circuits that gets too fast and they also have problem in laying out boards because they have no idea how to deal with it.On the side note, you serious trying to compare learning C++ with any of the calculus class? Forget ODE or PDE, try Cal I or Cal II. I refer to people that has to program complicate scientific programs that involve EM and applied math knowledge. For those, programming language is about the easiest part of the job. I think there are quite a bit of software engineers that have degree of Physics or Math. It is really easy to switch from Physics and Math to programming than the other way around in the scientific field programming. I hate to say, people that survive the physics or math major will find programming kids stuff. For people that know only programming might find it too difficult to get into some of the scientific programming. I know for fact the few software engineers in the last company were so so much more than just knowing how to do C++ and Windows applications.

 

[yangman]

I agree with you. Programming really is trivial. But, I have had friends graduating from university with a BS in Information Management (or something like that) , who started software-TESTER positions at Microsoft at $80k/year. His job is to write test scripts in javascript or C#, fresh out of college with a BS and he gets 80k. That is more than many hires will get with a masters degree in RF design, which everyone knows is WAY harder than information management.

The key point here is that the difficulty does not necessarily translate to wages. The market demand is important (which is difficult to predict). Your ability to do your job well compared to others is important, etc. Your pride in your analog/RF studies is great, but there are many paths and digital does not make you less of an engineer. You don't need to start college with the outlook "I am going to study the thing with the MOST math".

 

[Averagesupernova]

Yungman I have never said one job is better than the other or anything of the sort. I am not a digital engineer. It is a matter of perspective. People on this forum get tired of your attitude, that's all. YOU are the one making comparisons between one job and the next.

On the side note, you serious trying to compare learning C++ with any of the calculus class? Forget ODE or PDE, try Cal I or Cal II. I refer to people that has to program complicate scientific programs that involve EM and applied math knowledge. For those, programming language is about the easiest part of the job.

They are all tools, some of them obviously more difficult to learn than others. Your attitude reminds me of the Asian jacka$$ on King of the Hill who is Hanks neighbor. Luckily I have known enough Asians to know they are all not like that.

 

[yungman]

Again, did you read the whole thread? It is about student studying in school, not about the job later on. It is about if you take the easy way out, barely creep through the difficult subject and find themselves out of option later in life.

If you like at this way about tool, an engineer is a tool of making a product, a product is a tool to make people's life better.

You are off the subject.