RF Engineer from China Give Advice

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the value of studying different fields within electrical engineering (EE), particularly contrasting digital electronics with electromagnetic (E&M) and radio frequency (RF) circuit design. Participants share personal experiences and opinions on the perceived challenges and merits of each area, touching on the implications for career prospects and engineering competence.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue against focusing on digital electronics, suggesting that it is too easy and lacks depth compared to E&M and RF circuit design.
  • Others share experiences of rapid learning in digital fields, claiming that the skills can be acquired quickly and do not require extensive study.
  • Concerns are raised about the prevalence of engineers who lack foundational knowledge in E&M and analog design, with some suggesting that this leads to poor engineering practices.
  • Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the underlying principles of circuits, particularly in RF design, where tools like the Smith Chart are highlighted as essential for intuition.
  • There is a discussion about the fast-paced nature of digital technology and the need for continuous learning, contrasting it with the perceived stability of analog and RF fields.
  • Some participants advocate for following personal interests rather than solely pursuing what is deemed the "hardest" path, suggesting that passion can lead to success regardless of the field.
  • Concerns are expressed about the job market favoring software engineering and the ease of learning programming languages compared to more complex engineering principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of opinions, with no clear consensus on the value of digital versus analog/RF engineering. Some agree on the importance of foundational knowledge in E&M and analog design, while others defend the viability and necessity of digital skills in modern engineering.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various personal experiences and anecdotal evidence regarding the learning curves and job market dynamics in different engineering fields, indicating a diversity of perspectives without resolving the underlying debates.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to electrical engineering students, professionals considering their career paths, and individuals exploring the differences between digital and analog/RF engineering disciplines.

  • #31
"" who started software-TESTER positions at Microsoft at $80k/year. ""

a sign of the folly of our time.
IMHO microsoft personifies mediocrity and for some reason we worship that. i wish i could live long enough to see how history regards last half of 20th century.

Remember Robert Pirsig's memo to Western Civilization -
"Pick up your trash on the way out" -- Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
jim hardy said:
""
a sign of the folly of our time.
IMHO microsoft personifies mediocrity and for some reason we worship that.

You forgot about Excel. That has not been mediocre for about twenty years.
As for the rest . . . . .you only have to look at the Windows startup screen to see mediocre.
 
  • #33
Actually the thread is all about studying RF and Analog. As for jobs, a lot of the digital, firmware etc. get good pay, I never challenge that. I don't know their pay scale, I never hire a software person. People that I hired HAS to be able to do both, I don't hire anyone that is only in one side.

The whole thread to me is about paying the piper and you'll have option in the future be it that your interest is in digital firmware. As long as you get good foundation, you can pick it up.

All advanced books are written in Calculus, if you don't have good calculus background like me before, Those books quickly become gibberish...to me all these years. That is the reason after I retired, I button up and make up all the calculus to PDE and really study the EM theory. I might come out strong in this subject, but this is my own life experience. I went very far with the little knowledge I had, but I always felt there is a hole that I cannot jump over. That's why at my old age, I determine to overcome this. 4 years! 6 days a week, three hours a day. My wife think I am crazy.

If I can change the mind of one student, I think I accomplished something. Don't take the easy way out. Take the time and understand the basic Calculus and circuit theory. Even I gone through one and half semester of calculus, I was getting C, that really don't help. I started on page ONE of the calculus book this time! After Antenna, my next goal is Complex Analysis, preparing to climbing my Mt. Everest...JD Jackson Classical Electrodynamics.
 
Last edited:
  • #34
Thread locked pending moderation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K