Ricci tensor of schwarzschild metric

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Ricci tensor of the Schwarzschild metric, specifically addressing the non-vanishing components when the metric is expressed as $$ds^2 = e^{v}dt^2 - e^{u}dr^2 - r^2(d\theta^2 +sin^2\theta d\phi^2$$. It is established that while the Ricci tensor is symmetric, it does not need to be diagonal, even if the metric tensor is diagonal. The presence of non-diagonal components, such as $$R_{tr}$$, arises from the dependence of the functions u and v on both r and t. The discussion clarifies that determining the non-vanishing components of the Ricci tensor requires examining its form rather than assuming diagonal properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity concepts, particularly the Schwarzschild metric.
  • Familiarity with tensor calculus and the properties of the Ricci tensor.
  • Knowledge of differential geometry, especially in the context of curved spacetime.
  • Experience with mathematical notation used in physics, such as indices and derivatives.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Ricci tensor from the metric tensor in general relativity.
  • Explore the implications of non-diagonal Ricci tensor components in various spacetimes.
  • Learn about the Schwarzschild interior metric and its applications in astrophysics.
  • Investigate the role of the Ricci scalar in vacuum and non-vacuum spacetimes.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for physicists, mathematicians, and students specializing in general relativity, particularly those interested in the properties of the Ricci tensor and its implications in curved spacetime metrics.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
In schwarzschild metric:

$$ds^2 = e^{v}dt^2 - e^{u}dr^2 - r^2(d\theta^2 +sin^2\theta d\phi^2)$$
where v and u are functions of r only
when we calculate the Ricci tensor $R_{\mu\nu}$ the non vanishing ones will only be $$R_{tt}$$,$$R_{rr}$$, $$R_{\theta\theta}$$,$$R_{\phi\phi}$$
But when u and v now depend on r and t, we get an extra term of Ricci tensor which is the
$$R_{tr}$$ I thought that if our matrix is diagonal we should not get a non diagonal Ricci tensor and all the Ricci tensors must be diagonal. Am I mistaken?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are mistaken that all Ricci tensors must be diagonal. The Ricci tensor is symmetric, but it does not have to be diagonal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhyAmateur
Aha, is there a way to find out which are the nonvanishing? Or I will have to try it for every single pair?
 
No, a diagonal metric tensor doesn't have to lead to diagonal ricci tensor. That is because it may be true that g_{\mu \nu} is diagonal, in practice only g_{\mu \mu} is non-vanishing, however the Ricci Tensor also has indices that come from derivatives of g_{\mu \nu}, and since the last can depend on any x^\rho then its derivatives don't have to vanish in general. In other word you can't write R_{\mu \nu} = (A) g_{\mu \nu} with A an index free operator with derivatives etc...

As for whether you can determine the non-vanishing, I think you have to look at the Ricci tensor's form before determining it. In most books I've seen they always start and derive everything up to Ricci scalar...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhyAmateur
pervect said:
because it's a vacuum space-time

I'm not sure the OP was only talking about the vacuum Schwarzschild metric; based on the line element he wrote down, I think he intended the more general usage of "Schwarzschild-type metric", meaning a metric for a spherically symmetric spacetime, not necessarily vacuum, that uses Schwarzschild coordinates (i.e., spherical coordinates with ##r## defined as circumference divided by ##2 \pi## ). This usage is not terribly common, AFAICT, but it is found, for example, at some points in MTW.
 
Ooops, that's the interior Schwarzschild metric...
 
PeterDonis said:
I'm not sure the OP was only talking about the vacuum Schwarzschild metric;
Yeah, my bad
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K