Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Richard Rhodes: X-Ray Flux has Mass?

  1. Dec 20, 2012 #1
    On pp. 459 of Dark Sun: The Making of the Hydrogen Bomb Richard Rhodes writes:
    He is talking about soft-x-rays in that quote. I understand that X-rays are massless so their weight is zero regardless of the density of the flux. Is this not correct? Is there a better comparison he could have used to describe the density of the X-ray flux?
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 20, 2012 #2


    User Avatar
    2017 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    Photons as particles do not have mass, but if you consider the total energy of a box at rest (with radiation inside), it has a mass equivalent to its energy content (divided by c^2).
    In the same way, a proton has a mass of ~940 MeV/c^2, while its (valence) quarks inside just have mass of ~10 MeV/c^2.
  4. Dec 20, 2012 #3


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    Nuclear detonations release energy in a broad EM spectrum. One sees the bright visible portion of the spectrum, but there is infrared, visible, UV, X-ray and gamma ray. The nuclear fission produces prompt gamma rays, and some of the fission products release gammas and beta particles. The high energy fission products, gammas, betas and X-rays then ionize atoms in the plasma and atmosphere, and these in turn release infrared, visible, UV and X-ray.

    Perhaps Rhodes is referring to the equivalent-mass of the energy as indicated by mfb, or perhaps he is thinking of the momentum of the photons.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: Richard Rhodes: X-Ray Flux has Mass?
  1. Cosmic ray fluxes? (Replies: 6)