http://arxiv.org/abs/1202.2115(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know Arxiv isn't a real journal, but this caught my eye.

Is this a meaningful physical interpretation of the Riemann hypothesis?

From what I understand, the zeta function can be modeled as a wave, but attempting to solve for the real part requires infinite recursion- thus RH is axiomatic and unprovable.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Is this a valid physical analogy for the Riemann Hypothesis?

Tags:

Loading...

Similar Threads - valid physical analogy | Date |
---|---|

Vector Notation in Nolting Theoretical Physics 1 | Monday at 10:21 PM |

I Are there relations that are valid for any field? | Aug 26, 2017 |

Failure to see the validity of an approximation to DiffEq. | Dec 8, 2015 |

Step Validity with the Fourier Transform of Convolution | Jul 21, 2015 |

How is f(x)=sqrt(x) a valid function? | Sep 5, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**