Prove the following:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

If f is Riemann integrable on an interval [a,b], show that ∀ε>0, there are a pair of step functions

L(x)≤f(x)≤U(x)

s.t.

∫_a^b▒(U(x)-L(x))dx<ε

My proof:

Since f is Riemann integrable on [a,b] then, by Theorem 8.16, ∀ε>0, there is at least one partition π of the interval [a,b] s.t.

∑_(k=1)^n▒〖ωf([x_(k-1),x_k ])(x_k-x_(k-1))〗<ε

Let L(x)=inf〖f(x)〗 ∀x∈[x_(k-1),x_k] and let U(x)=sup〖f(x)〗 ∀x∈[x_(k-1),x_k]. Note that

ωf([x_(k-1),x_k ])(x_k-x_(k-1) )=U(x)-L(x)

so

∑_(k=1)^n▒〖(U(x)-L(x))(x_k-x_(k-1))〗<ε

|∑_(k=1)^n▒〖(U(x)-L(x))(x_k-x_(k-1))〗-0|<ε

Hence,

∫_a^b▒(U(x)-L(x))dx<ε

Which is precisely the statement needed to be proven. ∎

I feel like my proof makes sense, but I would like to get some feedback to see if anyone sees any flaws in my logic. Note that I essentially explained the details of Theorem 8.16 in my proof. Also, ignore the ▒'s, as they were created when copying and pasting from Word.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Riemann integrals and step functions

Loading...

Similar Threads for Riemann integrals step | Date |
---|---|

I Wrong proofs of Riemann hypothesis | Mar 25, 2017 |

Complex Analysis: Cauchy Riemann Equations 2 | Sep 28, 2014 |

Pointwise convergence of Riemann integrable functions | Sep 9, 2014 |

Riemann-Stieltjies Integrals | Nov 26, 2012 |

Cardinalic flaw of Riemann integral | Aug 22, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**