Riemann Sums: Understanding Expression of Angular Coordinate Theta

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riemman
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the evaluation of the integral \(\int^{-\pi+\epsilon}_{\pi-\epsilon} d\theta\), where \(\theta\) is defined as an angular coordinate within the interval (-\pi, \pi). Participants clarify that this integral can be expressed as \(-\int_{-\pi+\epsilon}^{\pi-\epsilon} d\theta\), emphasizing the importance of the integration limits and the direction of integration. The final evaluations yield \(-2(\pi - \epsilon)\) for both expressions, confirming the consistency of the results despite the unconventional notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann sums and integrals
  • Familiarity with angular coordinates and their properties
  • Knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Ability to manipulate limits of integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of definite integrals, particularly the reversal of limits
  • Explore angular coordinate systems in more depth
  • Learn about the implications of integrating over discontinuous intervals
  • Investigate the geometric interpretations of integrals in polar coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians working with angular coordinates, and anyone interested in the application of Riemann sums in evaluating integrals.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
there is correct the expresion [tex]\int^{-\pi+\epsilon}_{\pi-\epsilon} d\theta[/tex]...where [tex]\theta[/tex] is a angular coordinate between [tex](-\pi,\pi)[/tex]...¿what means this?...

i believe that this mean that the angular coordinate theta runs from [tex]\pi-\epsilon[/tex] to
[tex]-\pi+\epsilon[/tex] in the sense anti clock (figure)
 

Attachments

  • Dibujo11.JPG
    Dibujo11.JPG
    4.5 KB · Views: 406
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a bit peculiarly written. I would use
[tex]\int_a^b f(x)dx= -\int_b^a f(x) dx[/tex]
to write
[tex]\int_{\pi- \epsilon}^{-\pi+ \epsilon} d\theta= -\int_{-\pi+ \epsilon}^{\pi- \epsilon} d\theta[/tex]

and it would NOT be the yellow portion of your picture but, rather, the white portion.

And, if it is really only [itex]d\theta[/itex] itself you are integrating,
[tex]\int_{\pi- \epsilon}^{-\pi+ \epsilon} d\theta= \left[ \theta\right]_{\pi- \epsilon}^{-\pi+ \epsilon}= -\pi- \epsilon- (\pi- \epsilon)= -2(\pi- \epsilon)[/tex]
and
[tex]-\int_{-\pi+ \epsilon}^{\pi- \epsilon} d\theta= -\left[\theta\right]_{-\pi+ \epsilon}^{\pi- \epsilon}= -(\pi+ \epsilon-(\pi- \epsilon))= -2(\pi- \epsilon)[/tex]
again.
 
there is a way that the integral follows the path yelow?'...i can't to use in my problem [tex]\int_{-\pi}^{-\pi+\epsilon}+\int_{\pi-\epsilon}^{\pi}[/tex] in my problem
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K