Riemannian manifold and general relativity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the number of independent metric functions in an N-dimensional Riemannian manifold as outlined in "General Relativity" by Hobson. The correct formula for independent metric functions is 1/2 * N * (N + 1), accounting for the symmetric property of the metric tensor g_{\mu \nu}. The confusion arose from an incorrect reference to 1/2 * N * (N - 1), which does not consider the symmetry of the metric. Understanding this symmetry is crucial for grasping the structure of Riemannian manifolds in the context of general relativity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemannian geometry
  • Familiarity with metric tensors
  • Knowledge of symmetric matrices
  • Basic concepts of general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of symmetric matrices in linear algebra
  • Explore the role of metric tensors in general relativity
  • Learn about the implications of Riemannian manifolds in physics
  • Investigate advanced topics in differential geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mathematicians specializing in geometry, and researchers in general relativity will benefit from this discussion.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


My book ("General Relativity" by Hobson on page 32) says that an N-dimensional manifold has 1/2 * N * (N-1) independent metric functions. I am confused about why there is a limit at all to the number of independent metric functions [tex]g_{\mu \nu}[/tex]. It probably has to do with the symmetric property of the metric.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you're confused about what they mean by "indpendent functions". If we ignored symmetry considerations, the metric would have N2 indepedent functions: g11(x), g12(x), ..., gNN(x). But the metric must be symmetric, gmn(x)=gnm(x). The number of indepednet functions is then the number of elements on or above the main diagonal in an NxN matrix; this number is (1/2)N(N+1). [Not, as you wrote, (1/2)N(N-1); your book has the correct result.]
 
Thank you. And you're right it is 1/2 * (N) * (N+1)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
953
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
2K