Right inverse, left inverse, binary operations

Click For Summary
In the discussion, participants explore the concept of left and right inverses within a binary operation defined on a set B, emphasizing the importance of the neutral element and associativity. It is established that if an element has both a left and right inverse, they must be equal, demonstrating that the operation's properties lead to a unique inverse. Confusion arises from the choice of symbols for inverses, but clarification is provided that these symbols are arbitrary and do not affect the underlying definitions. The discussion concludes that understanding the relationships between the elements and their inverses is crucial for solving the problem. Ultimately, the goal is to show that the left and right inverses coincide under the given operation.
Panphobia
Messages
435
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


If * is a binary operation on a set B, and the domain of definition is B^2, if * is associative and the neutral element is p. If r and l are elements of b we can say that r is a left inverse of l under * iff r * l = p, and l is a right inverse of r iff l * r = p. Show that if an element of B has a left and right inverse, then they are equal.

The Attempt at a Solution


Does the neutral element have anything to do with finding the answer, also what does associativity have to do with finding the answer? All I can think of is since there is only one neutral element in *, r = p and l = p, but I don't think that is the answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Panphobia said:

Homework Statement


If * is a binary operation on a set B, and the domain of definition is B^2, if * is associative and the neutral element is p. If r and l are elements of b we can say that r is a left inverse of l under * iff r * l = p, and l is a right inverse of r iff l * = p. Show that if an element of B has a left and right inverse, then they are equal.


The Attempt at a Solution


Does the neutral element have anything to do with finding the answer, also what does associativity have to do with finding the answer? All I can think of is since there is only one neutral element in *, r = p and l = p, but I don't think that is the answer.

Sure, you have to assume there is a neutral element p, so that for any x, x*p=p*x=x. Now suppose r is a right inverse of x (so x*r=p) and l is a left inverse of x (so l*x=p). Associativity tells you (l*x)*r=l*(x*r), yes? So?
 
Does it matter than the question say l * r = p and r * l = p, where does the x come from? would this mean (l * r) * l = l * (r * l)?
 
Last edited:
Panphobia said:
Does it matter than the question say l * r = p and r * l = p, where does the x come from? would this mean (l * r) * l = l * (r * l)?

The letters were confusing and I changed them. Your writing (l * r) * l = l * (r * l) shows why. The definitions you've got are using 'l' to be a symbol for both the right and left inverse. They are two different things. Those definitions mean something independent of the particular symbols used. Suppose I tell you that b is a right inverse of c. Let's keep the symbol 'p' to mean the neutral element, though I probably would have used the symbol '1' instead. It's more suggestive. What does that mean?
 
Last edited:
Then why in the question is l * r = p, and r * l = p defined? btw r and l do not mean right and left inverse, they are arbitrary variables, the question says, "l is left inverse of r under * iff l * r = p, and l is a right inverse of r under * iff r * l = p". It is kind of confusing.
 
First off, look at some numbers you know, such as the rationals. With * being the multiplication operator you learned long ago and p being 1, what is the left inverse of 2 ? The right inverse? The answer is obviously 1/2 in both cases: 1/2*2 = 2*1/2 = 1. The goal of this problem is to show that if an element of B has both left and right inverses and if * is associative then there is only one inverse (i.e., the left and right inverses are one and the same).

Note that this result does not necessarily mean that * is commutative. What it does mean is that an element of B commutes with its multiplicative inverse.

Dick took the correct approach by giving that element of B that has both a left and right inverse a new symbol, x.
 
Panphobia said:
Then why in the question is l * r = p, and r * l = p defined? btw r and l do not mean right and left inverse, they are arbitrary variables, the question says, "l is left inverse of r under * iff l * r = p, and l is a right inverse of r under * iff r * l = p". It is kind of confusing.

Yes, they are arbitrary variables, and yes, it's kind of confusing. The reason it's confusing is because they made such a poor choice of arbitrary symbols. Try to unscramble it. You didn't answer my question. I'll repeat it. Suppose I tell you that b is a right inverse of c. What does that mean? Bypass the whole 'l' and 'r' thing.
 
Last edited:
c * b = p, where p is the neutral element
 
Panphobia said:
c * b = p, where p is the neutral element

Bingo! Now I'll tell you that d is a left inverse of c. Same question. And then can you show b=d?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
(d * c) * b = d * (c * b)
d * c = c * b = p
p * b = d * p
so this implies d = b, right?
 
  • #11
Panphobia said:
(d * c) * b = d * (c * b)
d * c = c * b = p
p * b = d * p
so this implies d = b, right?

Right. Couldn't be clearer. I'm almost wondering if they didn't choose the symbol choice in original definitions to try to test you and throw you off track.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #12
Thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
835
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K