MHB Ring of integer p-adic numbers.

AI Thread Summary
The ring of integer p-adic numbers, denoted as $\mathbb{Z}_p$, is established as a principal ideal domain (PID), meaning all its ideals are principal. The embedding function $\epsilon_p$ maps integers from $\mathbb{Z}$ into $\mathbb{Z}_p$, confirming that $\mathbb{Z}$ is a subset of $\mathbb{Z}_p$. The units in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ are characterized as those elements not divisible by the prime p, represented by the series where the leading coefficient is non-zero. Each non-zero element in $\mathbb{Z}_p$ can be uniquely expressed in the form $x = p^m u$, linking the valuation to the structure of the ideals. The unique maximal ideal of $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is $p\mathbb{Z}_p$, reinforcing the principal nature of its ideals.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hey! (Wave)

Let the ring of the integer $p$-adic numbers $\mathbb{Z}_p$.

Could you explain me the following sentences? (Worried)

  1. It is a principal ideal domain.
    $$$$
  2. The function $\epsilon_p: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}_p$ is an embedding.
    (So, $\mathbb{Z}$ is considered $\subseteq \mathbb{Z}_p$)
    $$$$
  3. The units of the ring $\mathbb{Z}_p$:

    $$\mathbb{Z}^*=\mathbb{Z} \setminus p \mathbb{Z}$$

    so the units are

    $$= \{ \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} a_n p^n | a_0 \neq 0\}$$
  4. Each element $x$ of $\mathbb{Z}_p \setminus \{ 0 \}$ has a unique expression of the form $x=p^m u | m \in \mathbb{N}_0$
  5. $\mathbb{Z}_p$ has exactly these ideals:

    $$0, p^n \mathbb{Z}_p (n \in \mathbb{N}_0)$$

    Furthermore, $\cap_{n \in \mathbb{N}_0} p^n \mathbb{Z}_0=\{0\}$ and $\frac{\mathbb{Z}_p}{p^n \mathbb{Z}_p} \cong \frac{\mathbb{Z}}{p^n \mathbb{Z}}$

    Last but not least, the unique maximal ideal of $\mathbb{Z}_p$ is $p \mathbb{Z}_p$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  1. Let $\mathfrak{p}$ be a nonzero ideal of $\mathbf{Z}_p$, and a nonzero $x \in \mathfrak{p}$ such that $\nu_p(x) < \infty$ is the smallest order in all of $\mathfrak{p}$. $x = p^{\nu_p(x)} a$ by definition of the valuation, implying $p^{\nu_p(x)} = a^{-1} x$. As the LHS is in $\mathfrak{p}$, $p^{\nu_p(x)} \in \mathfrak{p}$, indicating that $\left \langle p^{\nu_p(x)}\right \rangle$ is sitting inside $\mathfrak{p}$. But then any integer $y$ can be written as $y = p^{\nu_p(y)} a$, and assuming $\nu_p(y) \geq \nu_p(x)$, $y = p^{\nu_p(x)} \cdot (p^{\nu_p(y) - \nu_p(x)} a) \in \left \langle p^{\nu_p(x)} \right \rangle$. Hence $\mathfrak{p}$ sits inside $\left \langle p^{\nu_p(x)} \right \rangle$ in turn, but this is only possible if $\mathfrak{p} = \left \langle p^{\nu_p(x)} \right \rangle = p^{\nu_p(x)} \Bbb Z$, and we prove the first part of $\#5$ more generally. This implies that all of the ideals are principal, hence $\mathbf{Z}_p$ is a PID.
  2. What is your $\epsilon_p$? It's obvious that $\mathbf{Z}_p$ has a copy of $\mathbb{Z}$ sitting inside : take the infinite-tuple $(x_1, x_2, x_3, \cdots)$ where $x_i = n \pmod{p^i}$, $n$ being your given integer.
  3. Left as an exercise.
  4. This is straightforward from $\#4$. $x$ have the $p$-adic representation $$x = \sum_{k \geq \nu_p(x)} a_k p^k = p^{\nu_p(x)} \sum_{k \geq 0} a_k p^k$$ The sum there is a unit from exercise $\#4$, so you have the desired.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top