Using class equation to show that intersection is nontrivial

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr Davis 97
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Class Intersection
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that for a finite p-group ##G## with center ##Z(G)##, if ##N \not = \{e\}## is a normal subgroup, then ##N \cap Z(G) \not = \{e\}##. The proof utilizes the class equation derived from the action of ##G## on ##N## by conjugation, leading to the conclusion that since some prime ##p## divides ##|G|##, it must also divide ##|N \cap Z(G)|##. The participants confirm that the explanation of the class equation is sufficient, although a more rigorous approach could be beneficial.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite p-groups and their properties
  • Familiarity with group actions and conjugation
  • Knowledge of the class equation in group theory
  • Concept of normal subgroups and their significance in group theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the class equation in group theory
  • Learn about the implications of normal subgroups in finite p-groups
  • Explore the stabilizer theorem and its applications in group actions
  • Investigate examples of finite p-groups to solidify understanding of their structure
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying abstract algebra, group theory enthusiasts, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of finite p-groups and class equations.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


Let ##G## be a finite p-group and ##Z(G)## its center. If ##N \not = \{e\}## is a normal subgroup of ##G##, prove that ##N\cap Z(G) \not = \{e\}##.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Since ##N## is a normal subgroup we can let ##G## act on ##N## by conjugation. In a manner similar to the case when ##G## acts on itself, we can construct the following class equation. Let ##n_1,\dots,n_r## be representatives of the orbits of this action not contained in ##N\cap Z(G)##. Then $$|G| = |N\cap Z(G)| + \sum_{i=1}^{r}[G : \operatorname{Stab}_G(n_i)].$$ Since some prime ##p## divides ##|G|## and ##[G : \operatorname{Stab}_G(n_i)]## for all ##i\in [1,r]##, it follows that ##p## divides ##|N\cap Z(G)|##. Hence ##N \cap Z(G) \not = \{e\}##. QED

My main question is have I explained in enough depth how I obtain the class equation that I got? Do I need to show in a rigorous way that $$|G| = |N\cap Z(G)| + \sum_{i=1}^{r}[G : \operatorname{Stab}_G(n_i)],$$ or is what I have written sufficient?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is sufficient.

The stabilizer formula is usually formulated for a single element. So if you like, you can show how the single element version ##|G|=|G.x|\cdot |C_G(x)|=|G:C_G(x)|\cdot |C_G(x)|## transforms into a version for entire ##N##. You used that different orbits are either disjoint or equal to obtain the sum, and that all fix points of ##N## are central. But your version is o.k.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K