Rocket Acceleration: Understanding Fuel Burn & Kinetic Energy

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ShamelessGit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration Rocket
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanics of rocket acceleration, specifically focusing on the relationship between fuel burn and kinetic energy. Participants explore concepts from Hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics, as well as the implications of fuel consumption rates in different reference frames.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the relationship between potential energy in rocket fuel and kinetic energy during acceleration, questioning the implications of fuel burn rates being proportional to the square of velocity.
  • Another participant points out that the kinetic energy calculation must also consider the kinetic energy of the ejected reaction mass, which was overlooked.
  • A different participant cautions against applying Newtonian mechanics to rockets, noting that total energy is not conserved within the rocket alone, as it ejects mass to generate thrust.
  • This participant suggests that acceleration will increase over time with a constant burn rate and mentions the Tsiolkovsky ideal rocket equation as relevant to the discussion.
  • Another participant introduces the Oberth Effect, stating that higher speeds allow for more energy to be extracted from the same amount of fuel, due to the constant force generated by the rocket regardless of its velocity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and disagreement, particularly regarding the implications of fuel burn rates and the application of Newtonian mechanics to rocket dynamics. There is no consensus on the correct interpretation of the relationship between acceleration, fuel burn, and kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in their assumptions and the complexity of applying classical mechanics to rocket systems, indicating that the discussion involves unresolved mathematical steps and varying interpretations of energy conservation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying rocket propulsion, mechanics, or energy conservation principles in physics, as well as individuals curious about the dynamics of acceleration in relation to fuel consumption.

ShamelessGit
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework problem, and I'm not sure if I'm putting this in the right section, so I apologize in advance if I'm doing something wrong.

So far I just learned hamiltonian and Lagrangian mechanics, but I was never taught about how fuel burns when a rocket accelerates, and I'm having a conceptual problem now.

It seems to make sense that there is potential energy in the rocket fuel which is being burned in order to accelerate the rocket. So assuming a rocket in space (no other forces) starts at rest, you would say that the energy is U0 = U + T, where U is the energy in the fuel and T is the kinetic energy.

It seems intuitive that the rocket would accelerate constantly, so you would say v = a*t and therefore T = (1/2)m*(at)^2. It seems strange to me that the kinetic energy, and therefore the rate at which fuel has been burned up, is proportional to a square. You can derive the energy equation by time and get dU/dt = - m*a^2*t, which means the rate at which fuel burns goes up linearly with time. That doesn't make sense to me. It seems to say that the rocket has to burn fuel faster when it is up at higher speeds, which would seem to mean that the rate at which it burns fuel is dependent on the reference frame in which you are measuring it, which does not make sense.

I did some math where I assumed only U0 = U + T and that dU/dt was constant, and got that acceleration was proportional to t^-(1/2). Is this wrong? Something about this whole situation seems wrong to me. It seems like very basic physics say that the acceleration of the rocket and the rate at which it burns fuel cannot both be constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ShamelessGit said:
It seems intuitive that the rocket would accelerate constantly, so you would say v = a*t and therefore T = (1/2)m*(at)^2.

That's the kinetic energy of the rocket only. You forgot the kinetic energy of ejected reaction mass.
 
You have to be careful when applying Newtonian mechanics, in any form, to a rocket. The rocket's total energy is not a conserved quantity. A rocket works by ejecting mass from the rocket. Another way to look at it: The rocket is transferring momentum (and hence energy) to the external environment.

Yet another way to look at it: Energy is conserved in the rocket+exhaust system, as are linear momentum and mass.

What you should find is that acceleration increases over time given a constant burn rate. You should also be able to derive the Tsiolkovsky ideal rocket equation.
 
thanks guys
 
Actually you are correctly on to a non-intuitive phenomenon known as the Oberth Effect. Basically, the faster you are going, the more energy you get out of the same rocket fuel. This occurs because the rocket generates the same force regardless of relative velocity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
778
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K