Rocket ejecting mass in a direction perpendicular to its velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the physics of rocket propulsion, specifically the relationship between the mass of a rocket and the angle of ejected gas in relation to its velocity. The user presents a mathematical approach using the momentum equation, leading to the conclusion that the mass of the rocket can be expressed as $$M = M_o e^\frac{-v \theta}{u}$$. Feedback from other participants emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the velocity components and clarifying the use of differential notation in the equations. The discussion concludes with a resolution regarding the LaTeX formatting issues that obscured some equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket propulsion principles
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation equations
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of rocket propulsion dynamics
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum in multi-dimensional systems
  • Explore vector addition and its applications in physics
  • Practice formatting equations in LaTeX for clarity and accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, aerospace engineering, and mathematics who are interested in understanding rocket dynamics and the mathematical modeling of propulsion systems.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
Find the relation between the mass of the rocket (initial mass = M_o) and the angle between the velocity and the initial velocity. The gas is ejected with velocity u with respect to the rocket in a direction perpendicular to rocket's velocity v.
Relevant Equations
.
That was my approach:
$$P_f - P_i = [(m-dm)(v + dv) + dm(u+v+dv)] - [m(v)]$$
$$= mdv - dmv + dmu + dmv = mdv + dmu = 0$$

Since the variation of the rocket's velocity is perpendicular to itself, $$ dv = v d \theta => m v d \theta + dm u = 0$$

So we have $$\frac{dm}{m} = \frac{-v d \theta}{u}$$

And so, $$M = M_o e^\frac{-v \theta}{u}$$

Is that right? I am afraid that it can be wrong, but i am not sure why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please fix the LaTeX. We cannot read the bottom line.
 
kuruman said:
Please fix the LaTeX. We cannot read the bottom line.
I am not sure where should i fix. In my pc everything is right:
latex.png
 
I am not sure at all in what I am going to say but I think the rocket's initial component of velocity (say ##\vec{V_{0y}}##will remain unchanged, and all you have to do is calculate the other perpendicular component ##\vec{V_x}## (setting as ##V_{0x}=0##) and then vector add the two components ##V_x,V_{0y}## as being perpendicular to each other to get the final velocity ##\vec{V}=\vec{V_x}+\vec{V_{0y}}##.
 
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: Find the relation between the mass of the rocket (initial mass = M_o) and the angle between the velocity and the initial velocity. The gas is ejected with velocity u with respect to the rocket in a direction perpendicular to rocket's velocity v.
Relevant Equations:: .

That was my approach:
$$P_f - P_i = [(m-dm)(v + dv) + dm(u+v+dv)] - [m(v)]$$
$$= mdv - dmv + dmu + dmv = mdv + dmu = 0$$

Since the variation of the rocket's velocity is perpendicular to itself, $$ dv = v d \theta => m v d \theta + dm u = 0$$

So we have $$\frac{dm}{m} = \frac{-v d \theta}{u}$$

And so, $$M = M_o e^\frac{-v \theta}{u}$$

Is that right? I am afraid that it can be wrong, but i am not sure why.
You could motivate your treatment in a better way. For example, don’t use ##dv## because the change in the speed ##v## is zero so ##dv=0## by construction. Instead, use reasoning to say that you are taking the component of ##d\vec v## perpendicular to ##\vec v##.

Apart from that, it looks reasonable.

Delta2 said:
I am not sure at all in what I am going to say but I think the rocket's initial component of velocity (say ##\vec{V_{0y}}##will remain unchanged, and all you have to do is calculate the other perpendicular component ##\vec{V_x}## (setting as ##V_{0x}=0##) and then vector add the two components ##V_x,V_{0y}## as being perpendicular to each other to get the final velocity ##\vec{V}=\vec{V_x}+\vec{V_{0y}}##.
If this were the case, the exhaust would need to be perpendicular to the original direction of motion, not the current direction of motion (they are the same only at the beginning).
 
  • Like
Likes LCSphysicist and Delta2
Orodruin said:
If this were the case, the exhaust would need to be perpendicular to the original direction of motion, not the current direction of motion (they are the same only at the beginning).
Thanks, I now understand my faulty reasoning.
 
Herculi said:
I am not sure where should i fix. In my pc everything is right:
It is fixed now, thanks. I could see all the LaTeX lines except for the last, but now I see them all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
674