Rocket ejecting mass in a direction perpendicular to its velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of a rocket ejecting mass in a direction perpendicular to its velocity. The original poster explores the relationship between the mass of the rocket and the angle of ejection, utilizing principles of momentum conservation and velocity components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine the momentum equations and the implications of velocity components in the context of perpendicular mass ejection. Questions arise regarding the correctness of the original poster's approach and the interpretation of velocity changes.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the original poster's reasoning, with some participants providing feedback on the clarity of the mathematical expressions. Others suggest alternative considerations regarding the components of velocity and the nature of the exhaust direction.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with the formatting of LaTeX expressions, which may have impacted the clarity of the discussion. There is also mention of assumptions regarding the relationship between the initial and current directions of motion.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
Find the relation between the mass of the rocket (initial mass = M_o) and the angle between the velocity and the initial velocity. The gas is ejected with velocity u with respect to the rocket in a direction perpendicular to rocket's velocity v.
Relevant Equations
.
That was my approach:
$$P_f - P_i = [(m-dm)(v + dv) + dm(u+v+dv)] - [m(v)]$$
$$= mdv - dmv + dmu + dmv = mdv + dmu = 0$$

Since the variation of the rocket's velocity is perpendicular to itself, $$ dv = v d \theta => m v d \theta + dm u = 0$$

So we have $$\frac{dm}{m} = \frac{-v d \theta}{u}$$

And so, $$M = M_o e^\frac{-v \theta}{u}$$

Is that right? I am afraid that it can be wrong, but i am not sure why.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please fix the LaTeX. We cannot read the bottom line.
 
kuruman said:
Please fix the LaTeX. We cannot read the bottom line.
I am not sure where should i fix. In my pc everything is right:
latex.png
 
I am not sure at all in what I am going to say but I think the rocket's initial component of velocity (say ##\vec{V_{0y}}##will remain unchanged, and all you have to do is calculate the other perpendicular component ##\vec{V_x}## (setting as ##V_{0x}=0##) and then vector add the two components ##V_x,V_{0y}## as being perpendicular to each other to get the final velocity ##\vec{V}=\vec{V_x}+\vec{V_{0y}}##.
 
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: Find the relation between the mass of the rocket (initial mass = M_o) and the angle between the velocity and the initial velocity. The gas is ejected with velocity u with respect to the rocket in a direction perpendicular to rocket's velocity v.
Relevant Equations:: .

That was my approach:
$$P_f - P_i = [(m-dm)(v + dv) + dm(u+v+dv)] - [m(v)]$$
$$= mdv - dmv + dmu + dmv = mdv + dmu = 0$$

Since the variation of the rocket's velocity is perpendicular to itself, $$ dv = v d \theta => m v d \theta + dm u = 0$$

So we have $$\frac{dm}{m} = \frac{-v d \theta}{u}$$

And so, $$M = M_o e^\frac{-v \theta}{u}$$

Is that right? I am afraid that it can be wrong, but i am not sure why.
You could motivate your treatment in a better way. For example, don’t use ##dv## because the change in the speed ##v## is zero so ##dv=0## by construction. Instead, use reasoning to say that you are taking the component of ##d\vec v## perpendicular to ##\vec v##.

Apart from that, it looks reasonable.

Delta2 said:
I am not sure at all in what I am going to say but I think the rocket's initial component of velocity (say ##\vec{V_{0y}}##will remain unchanged, and all you have to do is calculate the other perpendicular component ##\vec{V_x}## (setting as ##V_{0x}=0##) and then vector add the two components ##V_x,V_{0y}## as being perpendicular to each other to get the final velocity ##\vec{V}=\vec{V_x}+\vec{V_{0y}}##.
If this were the case, the exhaust would need to be perpendicular to the original direction of motion, not the current direction of motion (they are the same only at the beginning).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist and Delta2
Orodruin said:
If this were the case, the exhaust would need to be perpendicular to the original direction of motion, not the current direction of motion (they are the same only at the beginning).
Thanks, I now understand my faulty reasoning.
 
Herculi said:
I am not sure where should i fix. In my pc everything is right:
It is fixed now, thanks. I could see all the LaTeX lines except for the last, but now I see them all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
858