Rocket Experiment: Why Calculations Were Off

  • Thread starter Thread starter jnimagine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Rocket
Click For Summary
The rocket experiment revealed significant discrepancies between calculated and actual heights, with the formula predicting 1127 units compared to the measured height of 82 units using a 40-degree angle. Factors contributing to this difference include air resistance, wind effects, and energy losses during flight, which can be difficult to quantify. Accurate calculations require knowledge of the rocket's thrust over time and its changing weight as propellant burns off. Including units in calculations is essential for clarity and accuracy. Understanding these variables can help explain the inaccuracies in height predictions.
jnimagine
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
we fired off a rocket in physics class and we have to write a report about it.
I found out that the height of the rocket calculated using formulas was very off from the real height of the rocket figured out by calculating the tangent of the angle of altitude. (there was an altitude person who measured the angle to the height of the rocket when it was fired off) That angle was 40degrees. The height I got using formulas ( first figuring out max kinetic energy then gravitational energy, then total energy, then the height) was 1127 while the one using distance measured from the rocket's highest point to where the altitude was measured and tan of 40 was 82 yah i know the two numbers aren't close at all.
So we have to discuss why the result is so off. Reasons other than things like human errors... what i have thought of so far are friction, wind, and energy losses...but i just can't seem to be able to explain those reasons very well... and could you also explain the energy losses during the flight that might have caused the calculations to be wrong?

Thank you for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, it's good to get in the habit of including units with each number. As to reasons for potential disagreements between the expected height and actual height...

-- How are you calculating the expected max height? Do you know the thrust of the rocket versus time (like from a stationary test of the rocket motor against a spring balance)? Do you know the weight of the rocket versus time as the propellant burns off? If you know those things, all that is left is air resistance and wind effects, which you can add into your calculations with some approximations.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
25K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
856