Conservation of energy with a rocket disagreement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a rocket's ascent, specifically focusing on the conservation of energy principles. The original poster presents a scenario where a 1 kg rocket is propelled by an 18 Newton thrust for 20 meters, seeking to determine the maximum height achieved while considering gravitational effects.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to reconcile differing interpretations of energy conservation, questioning whether the work done by the engine should equal the kinetic energy or the potential energy at maximum height. Some participants explore the implications of thrust as either the net force or the force provided solely by the engine.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, examining the assumptions regarding thrust and the work-energy theorem. There is a recognition of differing viewpoints on how to interpret the forces involved, with some guidance offered regarding the application of the work-kinetic energy theorem.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing debate about the definition of thrust and its implications for calculating work done against gravity. The discussion highlights potential misunderstandings about the relationship between thrust, net force, and energy conservation in the context of the problem.

Snakeish
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 1Kg rocket is fired off. The engine provides a thrust of 18 Newtons for 20 meters. What is the maximum height achieved by the rocket? Assume no loss of mass and no friction. Gravity=9.8m/s^2

Homework Equations


Work=Force x distance
Force=Mass x acceleration(or gravity)
Potential gravitational energy(PE)=Mass x Gravity x Height
Kinetic energy(KE)=(1/2) x Mass x Velocity^2I have a disagreement with my teacher on how to correctly solve this type of problem. Both of us agree that I need to find the work done by the engine of the rocket during the first 20 meters of flight first (W= 18N*20m=360 joules). After this is where my teacher and I begin to differ. My teacher says that I need to then set the work done by the engine = to the maximum PE of the rocket and solve for the height(W=PE so maximum height= W of engine / (Mass x Gravity) = 360/(1*9.8)= 36.7 joules). I believe that in this solution energy is not conserved.

From what I understand, since the rocket only stops accelerating at 20 meters, the work of the engine up to this point should be set = to its KE. This gives you a KE 360 joules. The rockets PE, if measured from the highest point of its flight down to 20 meters, is 360 joules. This value does not account for the 20 meters before the rocket begins to be decelerate from gravity when it is still accelerating therefore you must find the PE of the rocket at 20 meters (9.8m/s^2 * 20m * 1Kg = 196 joules) and add that onto the KE at 20 meters in order to have the maximum PE for the rocket (556 joules) since it will convert that KE into PE in a 1:1 rate. Using this value for PE you get a maximum of 56.7 meters.

Which of us is right with this? Is my logic sound in this matter?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Snakeish said:
18 Newtons for 20 meters.
Snakeish said:
Is my logic sound in this matter?
What's the net force acting on the rocket?
 
The 18 Newtons is assumed to have already accounted for gravity in my textbook so is the net force acting on the rocket during the first 20 meters.
 
Snakeish said:
The 18 Newtons is assumed to have already accounted for gravity in my textbook so is the net force acting on the rocket during the first 20 meters.

It appears to boil down to the interpretation of the "thrust". If the thrust is the force that the rocket receives from the engine alone, then your teacher is correct. If the thrust is the net force on the rocket (engine + gravity) then you are correct.

I believe the usual interpretation of thrust is the force of the engine only. Thus, if the engine were adjusted so that the rocket hovers at rest above the earth, then I think most people would say the magnitude of the thrust of the rocket equals the magnitude of the force of gravity rather than saying the thrust is zero.
 
Thank you for the help.
 
It simply is not true that "since the rocket only stops accelerating at 20 meters, the work of the engine up to this point should be set = to its KE." Gravity also does work over the 20 m distance.

The best way to look at this is to forget mechanical energy conservation and use the (more general) work-kinetic energy theorem, WNet = ΔK. Here WNet = WEngine+WGravity = F*d - mghmax and ΔK = 0.

This results in the teacher's solution.
 
kuruman said:
It simply is not true that "since the rocket only stops accelerating at 20 meters, the work of the engine up to this point should be set = to its KE." Gravity also does work over the 20 m distance.

Right, the rocket doesn't stop accelerating when the engine shuts off.

According to post #3, Snakeish says that the the 18 N "thrust" is the net force on the rocket (engine force + gravity force). That's an odd interpretation of "thrust", but if that's what the 18 N is meant to denote, then the work done by the 18 N force would equal the KE of the rocket at the point the rocket shuts off. This would lead to Snakeish's answer.

But I'm with you, kuruman. The teacher's answer corresponds to the more natural interpretation of the 18 N force.
 

Similar threads

Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K