Rocket Experiment: Why Calculations Were Off

  • Thread starter Thread starter jnimagine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Rocket
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on discrepancies between calculated and actual heights of a rocket launched in a physics class. The calculated height using energy formulas was 1127 units, while the actual height determined through tangent calculations at a 40-degree angle was only 82 units. Key factors contributing to this significant difference include air resistance, wind effects, and energy losses during the rocket's flight. Accurate measurements of thrust and weight over time are essential for improving height predictions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly energy conservation.
  • Familiarity with trigonometric functions, specifically tangent calculations.
  • Knowledge of rocket propulsion principles, including thrust and weight dynamics.
  • Awareness of factors affecting projectile motion, such as air resistance.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to calculate thrust-to-weight ratio in rocket propulsion.
  • Learn about the effects of air resistance on projectile motion.
  • Study energy loss mechanisms in rocket flights, including drag and fuel consumption.
  • Explore advanced physics simulations for modeling rocket trajectories.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching mechanics, and hobbyists interested in rocketry and aerodynamics will benefit from this discussion.

jnimagine
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
we fired off a rocket in physics class and we have to write a report about it.
I found out that the height of the rocket calculated using formulas was very off from the real height of the rocket figured out by calculating the tangent of the angle of altitude. (there was an altitude person who measured the angle to the height of the rocket when it was fired off) That angle was 40degrees. The height I got using formulas ( first figuring out max kinetic energy then gravitational energy, then total energy, then the height) was 1127 while the one using distance measured from the rocket's highest point to where the altitude was measured and tan of 40 was 82 yah i know the two numbers aren't close at all.
So we have to discuss why the result is so off. Reasons other than things like human errors... what i have thought of so far are friction, wind, and energy losses...but i just can't seem to be able to explain those reasons very well... and could you also explain the energy losses during the flight that might have caused the calculations to be wrong?

Thank you for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, it's good to get in the habit of including units with each number. As to reasons for potential disagreements between the expected height and actual height...

-- How are you calculating the expected max height? Do you know the thrust of the rocket versus time (like from a stationary test of the rocket motor against a spring balance)? Do you know the weight of the rocket versus time as the propellant burns off? If you know those things, all that is left is air resistance and wind effects, which you can add into your calculations with some approximations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K