Rod w/ Pivot and Attached Mass Pendulum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the maximum speed of a mass (2M) attached to a solid rod (length L, mass M) pivoted at its center. The solution employs energy conservation principles, equating potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) to derive the maximum speed as v = √(gL). Additionally, the moment of inertia (I) is calculated using I = (5M/2) * (L/2)², and the center of mass (CoM) is determined to be at x_cm = (5/6)L. The discussion emphasizes using energy conservation and moments of inertia for solving the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) equations.
  • Familiarity with torque and moment of inertia concepts.
  • Knowledge of rotational motion and angular velocity.
  • Ability to calculate center of mass for composite systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study energy conservation in rotational dynamics.
  • Learn about calculating moments of inertia for various shapes.
  • Explore the relationship between torque and angular acceleration.
  • Investigate advanced pendulum motion and its applications in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics, particularly those studying mechanics, engineers involved in dynamic systems, and educators teaching concepts of rotational motion and energy conservation.

srekai
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid rod of length L and mass M has a pivot through its center and is originally horizontal. Another mass 2M is then attached firmly to one end of the rod, and released. What is the maximum speed of the mass 2M attained thereafter? (Cornell 2009)

Homework Equations


Not 100% sure, see solution below
Approach 1:
PE = mgh
KE = ##\frac{1}{2}mv^2##

Approach 2:
Torque: ##\tau = rFsin \theta##
Moment of Inertia: ##I = mr^2##
Torque: ##\tau = I \alpha##

The Attempt at a Solution


I approached this two ways, first as a potential energy problem via a pendulum.
The max velocity of this object will be achieved when the pivot is 90 degrees.
So I set the half of the arm with the mass to be a pendulum with mass ##\frac{5M}{2}##
The starting height of the pendulum will be half of the rod's length ##\frac{L}{2}##

Setting KE = PE
$$\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{5M}{2} \cdot v^2 = \frac{5M}{2} \cdot g \cdot \frac{L}{2}$$
$$v = \sqrt{gL}$$

This doesn't seem quite right to me of course, so I tried to approach this as a problem with torque
Setting torque equal to ##\tau = \frac{L}{2} \frac{5M}{2} \cdot g \cdot sin(\theta)##
Then moment of Inertia is ##I = \frac{5M}{2} * \frac{L}{2}^2##

Not sure how to clear the rest of this approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy conservation is the way to go because the acceleration is not constant so you cannot use the standard kinematic equations. For the kinetic energy you should use the rotational form which means you need to find the moment of inertia about the pivot. You also need to find where the center of mass of this thing is and find how far it drops. That should be the ##y## in ##mgy##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: srekai
So, am I correct in stating that the moment of inertia is ##I = mr^2 = \frac{5M}{2} \cdot \frac{L}{2}^2##?

Then, I would solve for KE = PE, where KE = ## \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 = mgy = ## PE

Thereby, I solve for ##\omega## as ##\omega = \sqrt{\frac{2mgy}{I}}##, and then v = ##r \omega = \sqrt{2gy}##

My main question now is, how would I calculate y? I tried using the center of mass equation ##m_1 r_1 = m_2 r_2##, and this means that ##r_1 = 5r_2##. Not sure how to go beyond this.

Supposing I use the CoM equation as this ##x_{cm} = \frac{m_1x_1 + m_2x_2}{m_1+m_2}##, with ##x_1## as 0, and ##x_2## as L, I can set ##x_{cm} = \frac{5}{6} L##, is this my value?
 
Last edited:
I actually don't think you need to find the center of mass of the entire system. Does the center of mass of the rod (without the attached mass) change?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and TSny
person123 said:
I actually don't think you need to find the center of mass of the entire system
Yes, it is almost always easier to deal with moments of inertia, momenta, energy... separately for the simple components rather than as a compound body.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
980
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
947
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K