Roller coaster Conservation of Energy problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a roller coaster problem involving conservation of energy and forces experienced by a person at the top and bottom of a vertical loop. The original poster seeks to demonstrate that the difference in apparent weight at these two points is six times the normal weight, while ignoring friction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between speeds at different points in the loop, the application of conservation of energy, and the forces acting on a person at the bottom of the loop. Questions arise about the minimum speed required to maintain contact with the track and how to derive the apparent weight difference.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the necessary calculations and concepts, such as centripetal force and energy conservation. The discussion is progressing with attempts to clarify the relationship between speed and apparent weight, although a complete consensus has not been reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that friction is negligible and are focused on deriving relationships based on the physics of circular motion and energy conservation.

joseg707
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that on a roller coaster with a circular vertical loop, the difference in your apparent weight at the top of the circular loop and the bottom of the loop is 6 g's--that is six times your weight. Ignore friction. Show also that as long as your speed is above the minimum needed, this answer doesn't depend on the size of the loop or how fast you go through it.


Homework Equations


PE(1)+KE(1)=PE(2)+KE(2)
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not really sure what it is that they are asking me to solve for. I set up my problem from the the bottom of the loop. The bottom of the loop is 1 and the top of the loop is 2.

KE(1)=PE(2)+KE(2)

.5mv2=2mgr+.5mv2.

The mass cancels out but I don't know how to prove that at the top of the loop a persons weight at the top of the loop is 6x greater.

Things I tried

.5mv^2=12mgr+3mv^2

2.5mv^2=12mgr

2.5v^2=12gr

I gave up on that because I really didn't see how it was useful for what I needed to find. Can someone help me please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One must realize that the speed at the bottom v1 is greater than the speed at the top v2.

One must find v2, for which one uses the constraint the v2 is the minimum needed to maintain contact with the track, i.e. not fall. So what is v2?

Then apply the conservation of energy .5mv12=2mgr+.5mv22.

Think of centripetal force.
 
Ok so v22=gr.
I substitute that into my energy equation and I get:
.5mv12=2mgr+.5mgr
After all the algebra I get
v=[tex]\sqrt{5gr}[/tex]
I don't see how this is a step in proving that a person's weight is 6 times their normal weight at the top of the loop. Could you explain what is happening please?
 
At the bottom of the loop, what are the forces on the person?
 
Normal force and the force of gravity.
N-mg=ma
N-mg=mv2/r
N-mg=m5gr/r
N=5mg+mg
N=6mg

I see now! Thank you very much! =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K