Minimum Speed for a Roller-Coaster Car to Complete a Loop without Seat Belts

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum initial speed (vi) required for a roller-coaster car to complete a loop without seat belts. The key formula derived is vi = sqrt(2gh) for passengers holding on, and vi = sqrt(g*r) for those not holding on. The conversation emphasizes the importance of energy conservation principles in determining these speeds, particularly the conversion between kinetic and potential energy. Participants clarify the significance of correctly applying these principles to avoid dimensional errors in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly energy conservation
  • Familiarity with gravitational force and its effects on motion
  • Knowledge of circular motion dynamics and centripetal force
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations for solving physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems
  • Learn about centripetal acceleration and its role in circular motion
  • Explore the effects of friction and other forces in roller-coaster dynamics
  • Investigate real-world applications of physics in amusement park ride design
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, amusement park engineers, and anyone interested in the mechanics of roller-coaster design and safety.

Lis
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Moved from technical forums so no template
  1. In an amusement park, the new roller-coaster ride The Loopy Looper is com- posed of a number of full loops, where the car goes round upside down. The car is attached to the track, but there are no seat belts. Consider one such loop, which can be taken as a circle with radius r. The mass of the roller-coaster car is M, including the weight of the people in it, and you may ignore all sources of friction. The car starts out at ground level with initial speed vi, and after that the engine is turned off. There is gravity g.

    a) What is the minimum value of vi, for the car to get to the top of the loop, assuming that the passengers hold on to something, to not fall out?

    My answer:

    Fs=G

    m(v^2/r)=mg

    v^2/r=g

    v=sqrt(g*r)

    Am I thinking right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The velocity you have calculated is the minimum required speed 'at the top of the loop'. Are the speeds at the ground level and the top level equal? [Hints: Use energy conservation.]
 
Thank you for answering.

1/2mvi^2 = 1/2mvf^2

vi^2=sqrt(r*g)

Is that correct?
 
Lis said:
Thank you for answering.

1/2mvi^2 = 1/2mvf^2

vi^2=sqrt(r*g)

Is that correct?
You have forgot to consider the potential energy term.
 
ops, ok i´ll try again:

1/2mvi^2 + mghi = 1/2mv^2 + mghf

Multiplyng by 2

mvi^2= mv^2 + 2(mghf)

vi=sqrt(mv^2 + 2(mghf))


 
Lis said:
ops, ok i´ll try again:

1/2mvi^2 + mghi = 1/2mv^2 + mghf

Multiplyng by 2

mvi^2= mv^2 + 2(mghf)

vi=sqrt(mv^2 + 2(mghf))
Exactly! :thumbup:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lis
Great!
I could also need some help in b:

b) What is the minimum value of vi, for the car to get to the top of the loop, and for the people to not fall out as it goes round, even when not holding on to anything?

Can you give me some hints here as well?
 
Oh, sorry! I missed the line.
Lis said:
assuming that the passengers hold on to something
If the passenger hold on to something, he does not need to have any velocity at the top of the loop to not fall out. At the ground level, he just needs to have kinetic energy = mass * g * height of the top of the loop
The problem we have solved earlier is for the case when the passenger does not hold on to something.
Sorry once again for my mistake.
 
Okey so the answer i solved belongs to the problem where the passenger does not hold on to something?

So fore the case where the passengers is holding on:

vi= sqrt(2gh)

Correct?
 
  • #10
Lis said:
Okey so the answer i solved belongs to the problem where the passenger does not hold on to something?

So fore the case where the passengers is holding on:

vi= sqrt(2gh)

Correct?
Exactly!
 
  • #11
Great! Thank you :-)
 
  • #12
Lis said:
vi=sqrt(mv^2 + 2(mghf))
That's dimensionally wrong, with masses on one side but not the other.
The original question specified r, no need to change that to hf.
You need to combine this with your earlier equation to get rid of the reference to v (vf) on the right.
 
  • #13
I totally agree with you. Thank you! I was running out of time earlier so that might be the reason why i did those silly mistakes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
19K