Rooting for the Steelers: A Cleveland Native's Story

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the rivalry between the Pittsburgh Steelers and the Green Bay Packers, with participants sharing personal anecdotes and opinions on both teams. Many express a nostalgic connection to their childhood teams, particularly in relation to the Steelers and Browns rivalry. There is excitement for the Puppy Bowl, with some participants preparing themed snacks. Predictions for the game include a close score favoring the Steelers, although there are mixed feelings about officiating bias towards Pittsburgh. As the game unfolds, excitement builds for the Packers, who ultimately win, leading to celebrations among Packers fans and critiques of the Steelers' performance, particularly their turnovers. The conversation also touches on the changing dynamics of football, including strategies that favor passing over running plays. Overall, the thread captures a blend of personal stories, game predictions, and reflections on the teams’ performances.

Who are you rooting for in the Super Bowl?

  • Green Bay Packers

    Votes: 11 33.3%
  • Pittsburgh Steelers

    Votes: 10 30.3%
  • Don't care

    Votes: 6 18.2%
  • Super Bowl? What's that?

    Votes: 6 18.2%

  • Total voters
    33
  • Poll closed .
  • #31
For a while, it looked like this was going to be a blowout for the Packers. But the Steelers came back! Now it's do or die time for them: they're down six points, and they get the ball with two minutes to go and only one time-out left...

[added] Nope, no miracle this time. Good game anyway. Those three turnovers killed the Steelers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
PACKERS WIN! PACKERS WIN! THANK god ALMIGHTY, the PACKERS WIN!
 
  • #33
:biggrin:, I'm so happy!
 
  • #35
Wooooo! Go pack, go!
 
  • #36
Out of dozens of post-game articles I've read this morning, I feel http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/jordy-nelson-green-bay-packers-surprise-super-bowl-star-020611"tells the best behind-the-scenes story of the Packers trials both before and during the game, as well as their triumph.

What was hurting? “Everything,” [Nelson] said. “But it’s OK. We won the Super Bowl.”

ETA: http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/-Win-Injured-Woodson-breaks-down-during-halftim?urn=nfl-317672" highlights one of the reasons why they came back so strong in the second half.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #37
I don't follow American football, so I don't really have much to say about the game. However, I think the halftime performance was probably one of the worst I've ever seen. I think it sounded terrible.
 
  • #38
Dembadon said:
I don't follow American football, so I don't really have much to say about the game. However, I think the halftime performance was probably one of the worst I've ever seen. I think it sounded terrible.

Agreed. Just a bunch of lights and noise.
 
  • #39
I'm sooooo happy the Packers won. I'm sick of the Steelers winning so much. Plus it seems like the league favors the Steelers more than any other team..
 
  • #40
Half way through the 4th quarter the announcer said their had only been ten running plays in the entire game. It's all air ball now. I don't know how they pull this off without the excessive turnovers this would have caused years ago, but they do. Who needs running backs anymore?
 
  • #41
mheslep said:
Half way through the 4th quarter the announcer said their had only been ten running plays in the entire game. It's all air ball now. I don't know how they pull this off without the excessive turnovers this would have caused years ago, but they do. Who needs running backs anymore?

This was game plan. The Steelers have an amazing run defense. They also have an excellent front 7 (offensive line and linebackers). The Packers offensive game plan was to spread the Pittsburgh defense out using wide routes along the edges and then deeper crossing routes in the middle. This forces the linebackers to move back and cover or risk having lots of one on one matchups.

Lack of interceptions is a function of mostly one on one matchups against receivers and well thrown passes by Rodgers.

Regarding running backs: The Steelers were running all over the Packers, even when they were down. This almost lost the Packers the game. If Big Ben wouldn't have thrown so many interceptions and gotten so far behind, Pittsburgh could have ran the ball more and likely made the game MUCH, MUCH more difficult on the Packers.
 
  • #42
fillipeano said:
Plus it seems like the league favors the Steelers more than any other team..

I think that you are forgetting about the Patriots. lol
 
  • #43
I am glad i didnt bet anyone!

I was going to bet on steelers for $100 [PLAIN]https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon10.gif


It was a good game though [PLAIN]https://www.physicsforums.com/images/icons/icon7.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
64
Views
17K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
42
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 206 ·
7
Replies
206
Views
19K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
66K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
14K