MHB Roots of a polynomial with non-real coefficients.

juantheron
Messages
243
Reaction score
1
Let a,b,c,d be real numbers. Sauppose that all the roots of the equation $z^4 + az^3 + bz^2 + cz + d = 0$ are complex numbers

lying on the circle $\mid z\mid = 1$ in the complex plane. The sum of the reciprocals of the roots is necessarily:


options

a) a
b) b
c) -c
d) d


---------- Post added at 22:03 ---------- Previous post was at 21:31 ----------

Thanks Friends I have Got it

Let $\alpha\;,\beta\;,\gamma\;,\delta$ be the roots of Given EquationNow all Roots are Imaginary and lie on $\mid z\mid = 1$and Imaginary Roots are always occur in pair so Let $\alpha = x_{1}+iy_{1}\;\;\beta = x_{1}-iy_{1}$ and $ \alpha.\beta = x^2_{1}+y^2_{1} = 1$ Similarly $ \gamma = x_{2}+iy_{2}\;\;\delta = x_{2}-iy_{2}$ ] and $ \gamma.\delta = x^2_{2}+y^2_{2} = 1$ Now Using Vieta, s Formula$ \alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta = -a$ $ \alpha.\beta.\gamma+\beta.\gamma.\delta+\gamma \delta.\alpha+\delta.\alpha.\beta = -c$ $ \alpha.\beta.\gamma.\delta = d$ So $\displaystyle \frac{\alpha.\beta.\gamma+\beta.\gamma \delta+\gamma.\delta.\alpha+\delta.\alpha.\beta}{\alpha \beta.\gamma.\delta} = -\frac{c}{d} = - c$So $ \displaystyle \frac{1}{\alpha}+\frac{1}{\beta}+\frac{1}{\gamma}+\frac{1}{\delta} = -c$ because $ \alpha.\beta.\gamma.\delta = d=1$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
So Option $ \boxed{\boxed{c}} $ is Correct
I would like to provide a more detailed explanation for why the answer is option c) -c.

Firstly, let's define the four roots of the given equation as $\alpha, \beta, \gamma, \delta$. Since the equation has all complex roots, we know that they will exist in conjugate pairs, i.e. $\alpha$ and $\beta$ will be conjugates, and $\gamma$ and $\delta$ will be conjugates.

Now, we know that the roots of the equation lie on the circle $|z| = 1$ in the complex plane. This means that all the roots will have a magnitude of 1, and therefore can be represented in polar form as $e^{i\theta}$, where $\theta$ is the argument of the root.

Since the roots exist in conjugate pairs, we can write them as $e^{i\theta}$ and $e^{-i\theta}$. Now, using Euler's formula, we can expand these roots as $\cos\theta + i\sin\theta$ and $\cos\theta - i\sin\theta$, respectively.

Next, let's look at the sum of the reciprocals of the roots. This can be written as $\frac{1}{\alpha} + \frac{1}{\beta} + \frac{1}{\gamma} + \frac{1}{\delta}$. Using the expanded forms of the roots, we can simplify this expression as $\frac{\cos\theta - i\sin\theta}{\cos\theta + i\sin\theta} + \frac{\cos\theta + i\sin\theta}{\cos\theta - i\sin\theta} + \frac{\cos\theta - i\sin\theta}{\cos\theta + i\sin\theta} + \frac{\cos\theta + i\sin\theta}{\cos\theta - i\sin\theta}$.

Now, using the formula for complex conjugates, we can simplify this expression even further to $\frac{\cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta}{\cos^2\theta + \sin^2\theta} = 1$. Therefore, the sum of the reciprocals of the roots is simply 1.

Finally, using Vieta's formulas, we
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top