Rotating Bucket Dynamics: Oil vs. Water Surface Shapes

  • Thread starter Thread starter rbwang1225
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fluid Rotating
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
rbwang1225
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a bucket quarter filled with oil. When the bucket is rotating with the angular velocity ω, derive the equation of the surface h(x), where h is measured from the lowest of the surface and x is measured from the rotational axis. Does it change if we replace oil by water?

Homework Equations


##mω^2x=##centrifugal acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution


I am struggling the force diagram of the curled-up oil surface, but don't have a clear confirmation.
bucket.jpeg

Any help would be appreciated!
 
on Phys.org
2x would be centrifugal force, not acceleration. Drop the m to get acceleration (f = m*a). Force is just a scaled version of acceleration when the mass stays the same :wink:

At steady state You expect a small parcel of fluid at a point on the surface to remain stationary relative to the the fluid around it, so any net acceleration must be directed along the surface normal passing through the parcel and into the body of fluid. That gives you a clue for finding the slope of the surface at any distance from the rotation axis. Then use the fact that df/dx gives the slope of f(x) ...
 
Dear gneill:

Sorry for the typo. Here is my calculation
##\frac{dh}{dx}=\frac{m\omega^2x}{mg}##
Therefore, ##h-h_0=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\omega^2}{g}x^2##, where ##h## is the height measured from the surface to the bottom.
Am I right? I am still not clear about what you meant by "any net acceleration must be directed along the surface normal passing through the parcel and into the body of fluid".

Sincerely.
 
rbwang1225 said:
Dear gneill:

Sorry for the typo. Here is my calculation
##\frac{dh}{dx}=\frac{m\omega^2x}{mg}##
Therefore, ##h-h_0=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\omega^2}{g}x^2##, where ##h## is the height measured from the surface to the bottom.
Am I right? I am still not clear about what you meant by "any net acceleration must be directed along the surface normal passing through the parcel and into the body of fluid".

Sincerely.

Looks okay. The idea I was trying to across is that if the surface of the water is to remain still when it reaches steady state, there can be no further flow. So a small parcel of water at the surface can't experience any net force parallel to the surface -- otherwise it would want to move along the surface. So any net force (acceleration) that the parcel feels must be in a direction along the normal to the surface, and in fact directly into the surface (otherwise the parcel would rise off the surface).
 
I think I got the idea!
Here is my final force diagram of the system.
bucket.jpeg

And therefore, the answer for the second question is that the shape will not change if water is used.
 
rbwang1225 said:
I think I got the idea!
Here is my final force diagram of the system.
View attachment 54104
And therefore, the answer for the second question is that the shape will not change if water is used.

Sounds good to me :approve: