Rotation within a vacuum vs rotation with a pressurized environment.

  • Thread starter Thread starter BAUCE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation Vacuum
Click For Summary
An object can theoretically spin indefinitely in a vacuum, but placing it in a pressurized environment may cause it to slow down due to various forces. Calculating the time it takes for an object to stop rotating in such an environment involves understanding the forces acting on it, possibly including shape alterations. The discussion also touches on the challenge of capturing space debris, where stopping or matching the rotation is crucial. One proposed method involves surrounding the debris with a pressurized space to halt its spin, but this raises questions about feasibility. Conservation of momentum is a key principle that complicates this approach, suggesting that simply pressurizing the space may not effectively stop the rotation.
BAUCE
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
common sense tells me that if an object can remain spinning in the vacuum of space for eternity, than placing that same object within a pressurised environment will cause the object to slow to a stop. is there a way for me to calculate the time in which it would take an object to stop rotating within a pressurised environment? the goal would be to achieve the fastest time in stopping an object from spinning.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BAUCE said:
the goal would be to achieve the fastest time in stopping an object from spinning.
By what means? Changing the shape of the object?
 
A.T. said:
By what means? Changing the shape of the object?
thinking along the lines of trash in space. in order to reach out and grab a piece of debris, either it has to stop spinning, or the rotation must be matched. my thought is that rather than 'grabbing' it, surround it and pressurise the space around it so to stop the rotation.
 
BAUCE said:
thinking along the lines of trash in space. in order to reach out and grab a piece of debris, either it has to stop spinning, or the rotation must be matched. my thought is that rather than 'grabbing' it, surround it and pressurise the space around it so to stop the rotation.
Sorry, but this doesn't make any sense to me. Why would you do it?
 
BAUCE said:
thinking along the lines of trash in space. in order to reach out and grab a piece of debris, either it has to stop spinning, or the rotation must be matched. my thought is that rather than 'grabbing' it, surround it and pressurise the space around it so to stop the rotation.
That won't work because of conservation of momentum. We don't know your background. Do you understand "because of conservation of momentum" ?
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
5K