Rotational dynamic equilibrium problem on an angle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a rotational dynamics problem involving a crate being dragged at a constant velocity. The crate is tilted at an angle, and participants are exploring the concepts of translational and rotational equilibrium, including net forces and torques.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of equilibrium conditions, including net forces and torques being zero. There are attempts to express the tension in the strap and the weight of the crate in terms of their lever arms and angles. Questions arise regarding the correct placement of the axis for torque calculations and the expressions for lever arms.

Discussion Status

Some participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their reasoning and questioning their understanding of the lever arms and angles involved. Guidance has been offered regarding the choice of the axis for torque calculations, and there is ongoing exploration of how to express the lever arms based on the given dimensions of the crate.

Contextual Notes

The dimensions of the crate are provided, with a length of 0.9 m and a height of 0.4 m. Participants are also considering the implications of these dimensions on their calculations and the setup of the problem.

mx2ko
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A man drags a 67.0-kg crate across the floor at a constant velocity by pulling on a strap attached to the bottom of the crate. The crate is tilted 24.0° above the horizontal, and the strap is inclined 64.0° above the horizontal. The center of gravity of the crate coincides with its geometrical center, as indicated in the drawing. Find the magnitude of the tension in the strap.



Translational and rotational equilibrum (net torque is zero and net force is 0) for both x and y axes
center of gravity equation
torque-lever arm multiplied by force
torque=moment of inertia multiplied by angular accelaration
force=mass x acceleration

I do not have an attempt at the solution. I tried different things and nothing seemed to work
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mx2ko. Welcome to PF.

You got to give us something. :devil:

So, tell us more specifically what you tried. Or, tell us what basic physics principles you think apply to this problem and why you're having difficulty with applying those principles.
 
I know that the net force in the x and y direction both equal zero and the net torque equals zero because the object is in equilibrium since he is pulling the crate at a constant velocity, which means there is no acceleration.
I tried to solve for the tension force by making the net torque and forces equal to zero and then finding T based off of everything else that I could find. The double angle I think is what is messing me up. I know the weight of the crate divided both the length and the width/height of the crate in half I think and the normal force on the crate is acting on the corner that is touching the ground I think.
 
mx2ko said:
I know that the net force in the x and y direction both equal zero and the net torque equals zero because the object is in equilibrium since he is pulling the crate at a constant velocity, which means there is no acceleration.
I tried to solve for the tension force by making the net torque and forces equal to zero and then finding T based off of everything else that I could find.

Let's see, looks like you have three unknown forces: the tension force in the strap, the normal force acting at the lo

The double angle I think is what is messing me up. I know the weight of the crate divided both the length and the width/height of the crate in half I think and the normal force on the crate is acting on the corner that is touching the ground I think.

Great! You're on the right track. :smile:

Let's see. You have 3 unknown forces: the tension in the strap acting at one of the lower ends of the crate and the normal force and friction force acting at the other lower end of the crate that touches the ground.

Can you see a good place to take the origin (axis) for calculating the torques?
 
is the good place placing it on the spot where the crate touches the ground so the normal force and the friction are both zero? and its a typical axis not one that is tilted on an angle
 
mx2ko said:
is the good place placing it on the spot where the crate touches the ground so the normal force and the friction are both zero? and its a typical axis not one that is tilted on an angle

Yes, that's a good place to pick the axis. Then the torques due to the normal force and friction will be zero. The axis will not be tilted. It will run along the edge of the crate that touches the floor.
 
so then there would only be the weight and the tension that have torques. the weights lever arm is half the length x cosine24degrees i think. but what would the lever arm for the tension be since that would be needed to find the tension
 
actually I don't even think the lever arm of the weight is half the length x cos24degrees, but i could be wrong. so in that case I don't know how to find either of the lever arms
 
Yes, the only nonzero torques about the axis will be the torques due to the tension and the weight.

The lever arm of the tension can be expressed in terms of the length of the crate and the given angles. If the length of the crate is not given, then you will have to leave it in the expression as an unknown and hope it cancels out later .

To find an expression for the lever arm of the weight, you will need to know something about the height of the crate. Is anything given about the height? For example, is the height the same as the length?
 
  • #10
the length of the crate is .9 m and the height is .4 m. I don't understand what you mean by the lever arm of the tension is expressed in terms of the length of the crate and the given angles. Also, since the height is given, what would the lever arm for the weight be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K