Rotational Equilibrium problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a rotational equilibrium problem involving a uniform rod supported by a cable and resting against a wall. The challenge is to determine the minimum distance from a specific point at which an additional weight can be hung without causing the rod to slip, considering the static friction between the rod and the wall.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to analyze forces and torques, with one noting the importance of identifying the point of rotation. There is mention of separating forces into components and the challenge of managing multiple unknowns in the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on applying Newton's laws in both x and y directions to establish equations. There is an exploration of various axes of rotation to simplify the problem, with suggestions on choosing points that could help eliminate unknowns from torque equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants have noted the complexity of the problem due to the number of unknowns and the specific setup involving angles and distances, which may not have been fully detailed in initial posts.

joe889
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
One end of a uniform 4.00-m-long rod of weight w (Fg) is supported by a cable. The other end rests against the wall, where it is held by friction. The coefficient of static friction between the wall and the rod = 0.500. Determine the minimum distance x from point A at which an additional weight w (the same as the weight of the rod) can be hung without causing the rod to slip at point A.

Not sure how to tackle this one. separated tension force and friction force into x and y components. Just unsure of what to do with torques.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if it isn't rotating the sum of the torques is zero.

Where's the point x?
 
Hello sorry for being so sloppy, even left out the angle. It's kind of situated like this but not quite. http://hep6.physics.wayne.edu/harr/courses/2130/P8.17.jpg Except the angle is at the bottom right and is 37 degrees above horizontal (North of west I guess?) Point A is all the way to the bottom left where the rod hits the wall. Point B is all the way at the right end of the rod. X is the distance from A to the hanging weight.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
joe889 said:
One end of a uniform 4.00-m-long rod of weight w (Fg) is supported by a cable. The other end rests against the wall, where it is held by friction. The coefficient of static friction between the wall and the rod = 0.500. Determine the minimum distance x from point A at which an additional weight w (the same as the weight of the rod) can be hung without causing the rod to slip at point A.

Not sure how to tackle this one. separated tension force and friction force into x and y components. Just unsure of what to do with torques.

The bad thing about rotational equilibrium problems is the number of unknowns. The nice thing is we can take any axis we like as an axis of rotation. :cool:

My advice is to do Newton's law in the x and y directions first and count the number of new equations you need. (If you've got "n" unknowns, you need "n" equations.) Then all you need to do is find enough axes of "rotation" to get the rest of the equations you need. To use the torque equation you need to pick an axis of rotation. If nothing is rotating we can pick any point in space we want for a rotation axis. Good points to consider:

1) CM. Always a good choice.
2) If there is a rod in the problem, either end of the rod.
3) ANY point at which an unknown force acts on. The reasoning here is that this force has no moment-arm at this axis, so it drops out of the torque equation.
4) Any other point at which a force is acting on. Same argument as above, but here we are just trying to find a new equation.

The problem with choosing axes of rotation is that some axes give an equation that you already know. The above 4 choices of axis usually give you new equations to work with. (I make no promises, it depends on the physical system. But you should get at least SOME independent equations out of them.)

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K