Rotational Kinematics - Angular velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the angular velocity of a dumbbell system when it transitions from a horizontal to a vertical position. The user initially calculated the angular acceleration as 6.5 rad/s² but struggled to relate this to angular velocity. Another participant suggested using conservation of energy to find the angular velocity, noting that the change in the center of gravity corresponds to kinetic energy. The user attempted to apply this method but encountered errors in their calculations, particularly regarding the moment of inertia. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying conservation principles in rotational kinematics.
nahanksh
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://online.physics.uiuc.edu/cgi/courses/shell/common/showme.pl?courses/phys211/oldexams/exam3/fa07/fig19.gif
A dumbbell consists of a slender rod of negligible mass and length L = 1 m and small steel balls attached to each end with mass 1 kg and 2 kg, respectively. It is pivoted at its center about a horizontal frictionless axle and initially held in place horizontally. The dumbbell is then released. What is the angular velocity of the system when the rod is vertical?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have figured out the angular acceleration upon release is 6.5rad/s^2 and the angular acceleration is zero at vertical (because of torque = 0 at vertical)
But from there, i got stuck and i don't know how to link this acceleration into the velocity..


Please could someone help me out here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is easier to apply conservation of energy. When the rod is vertical, the centre of gravity is lower than in the horizontal position, the difference is equal to the kinetic energy.

ehild
 
ehild said:
It is easier to apply conservation of energy. When the rod is vertical, the centre of gravity is lower than in the horizontal position, the difference is equal to the kinetic energy.

I have tried to use the hint you have given..

Iw^2/2 = mgh

h = (2/3 - 1/2) ; length of center of gravity from pivot when it's at vertical

And i took moment of inertia I as 3*(2/3-1/2)^2

But when i calculated this, it was wrong...

I think RHS of the eqn is correct...

Is something wrong in LHS of the equation?

Please help me out...:(

I would really appreciate it .
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K