Rotational kinetic energy problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a rigid assembly consisting of a thin hoop and a thin radial rod, focusing on the rotational kinetic energy and angular speed of the assembly as it rotates about a horizontal axis. The context is rooted in concepts of mechanical energy conservation and moment of inertia.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conservation of mechanical energy, equating changes in kinetic and potential energy. There are attempts to calculate the moment of inertia for both the hoop and the rod, with questions about the application of the parallel axis theorem and the specific factors used in the inertia calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy changes, while others are exploring the reasoning behind the moment of inertia formulas. There is an ongoing clarification of concepts related to the setup of the problem and the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the energy given in the initial nudge is negligible, and there is a focus on understanding the implications of the assembly's configuration on its rotational dynamics.

bodensee9
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
Hello:

can someone help me with the following?

A rigid assembly of a thin hoop (of mass m and radius R of 0.15m) positioned on top of a thin radial rod (of mass m and length L = 2.0 R). (So imagine a circle on top of a stick, whereby if you extend the stick you will hit the center of the circle). If we give the assemblly a nudge the assembly will rotate around a horizontal axis that is perpendicular to the rod and lying on the bottom of the rod. Assuming that the energy given in the nudge is negligible, what is the assembly's angular speed about the rotation axis when it passes through the upside-down (inverted position)?

This is what I did:

I thought that since mechanical energy is conserved, so change in kinetic energy + change in potential energy = 0.

Kinetic energy = 1/2*I*v^2, where v = angular speed. I = moment of inertia, and in this case I found the inertia of the hoop = m*R^2 + m*(3R)^2 = 10*m*R^2.
The inertia of the rod = 1/3*m*L^2 = 1/3*m*(2R)^2.
Add the two up I got 34/3*m*R^2.

the potential energy I can treat as concentrated in the center of mass of the assembly. the y coordinate of the center of mass I found by: (m*R + m*3R)/2*m = 2R. Then I treat the total mass of 2m as concentrated at 2R (or -2R because it is inverted)

So my equation would give me

1/2*34/3*m*r^2*v^2 = 2R*2m*g
But I don't think this is right.

Any suggestions?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bodensee9 said:
So my equation would give me

1/2*34/3*m*r^2*v^2 = 2R*2m*g
But I don't think this is right.
Almost right. Set the KE equal to the (negative of the) change in PE. (What's the change in PE?)
 
Oh okay, I think the displacement would be 4R in that case? Thanks!
 
Right!
 
I understand the general equations in this problem, but why is the hoop being multiplied by (3R) [I = mR^2 + m(3R)^2] and the rod being multiplied by (1/3) [I = 1/3mL^2
 
Kinetic energy = 1/2*I*v^2, where v = angular speed. I = moment of inertia, and in this case I found the inertia of the hoop = m*R^2 + m*(3R)^2 = 10*m*R^2.
The inertia of the rod = 1/3*m*L^2 = 1/3*m*(2R)^2.

^^ I understand the moment of inertia equations, I = mR^2, but why are we multiplying by 3 for the hoop and by 1/3 for the rod?
 
Nash77 said:
^^ I understand the moment of inertia equations, I = mR^2, but why are we multiplying by 3 for the hoop and by 1/3 for the rod?
For the hoop: The rotational inertia of a hoop about its center of mass is I = mR^2; here we have to use the parallel axis theorem to find the rotational inertia about the axis of rotation, which is at the end of the rod. That's where the additional term of m(3R)^2 comes from.

Note that all points of the hoop are equidistant from the center, which is what allows us to use I = mR^2. That's not the case for a rod. The formula for the rotational inertia of a rod about one end is 1/3mL^2, where L is the length of the rod.

See: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mi.html#cmi"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K