Rotational Mechanics Problem: Solving for Height Using Energy Conservation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a rotational mechanics problem involving energy conservation to determine the height attained by a block and a ring system. Participants are analyzing the initial conditions, energy states, and the motion of the block and ring as the system evolves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of energy conservation principles, questioning the initial kinetic energy of the block and the ring's motion. There are inquiries about the relationship between the velocities of the block and the ring at maximum height and the implications of friction on their interaction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have offered insights into the conservation of momentum and energy, while others express confusion regarding the assumptions made about the system's energy states. There is no explicit consensus yet on the correct approach or solution.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the initial conditions of the block and ring, particularly the lack of initial kinetic energy for the block and the smooth surfaces that may affect the ring's rolling motion. Participants are also grappling with the implications of these conditions on the energy conservation calculations.

thunderhadron
Messages
140
Reaction score
0
Hi Friends I am getting some problem in solving this question every time with the help of energy conservation. Please help me out. Here is the question

https://fbcdn-sphotos-h-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/s480x480/32407_2637149505288_842292859_n.jpg

Well I am doing that thing ,

By energy conservation,

Total energy initially = Total energy final

i.e. Kinetic Energy of block + ring = Potential energy of Bock + ring

i.e.

1/2 mv2 + 1/2 mv2 + 1/2 Iw2 = mgh

mv2 + 1/2 mr2(ring). v2/r2 = mgh

afer solving this h = 2v2/g


But answer is always option (b).

Please friends help me out in this problem. I will be very thankful to all of u guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello thunderhadron...

The block B has no initial velocity,hence,no intial kinetic energy.Initially ,only the ring has translational and rotational kinetic energy.When the ring attains maximum height , what will be the motion of the block B ??
 
The problem states that initially the block is stationary.
 
Tanya Sharma said:
Hello thunderhadron...

The block B has no initial velocity,hence,no intial kinetic energy.Initially ,only the ring has translational and rotational kinetic energy.When the ring attains maximum height , what will be the motion of the block B ??


Hi Tanya, Thank you for the reply.
The Block will be doing linear motion and ring will also be doing linear along with it as seen from the ground.

But the major issue is that which law I should use to deduct block's velocity with respect to ring, when the ring is at the max height..
 
The block and ring make a system, and is no horizontal external force. What is conserved in addition to energy?

ehild
 
I am trying to solve this problem but it seems that I am missing out something while conserving energy. Initially, the ring has kinetic energy (rotational+translational). When the ring is at maximum height, the ring and the body B, both have kinetic energy too. But when I solve it, I don't get the right answer.
 
thunderhadron said:
The Block will be doing linear motion and ring will also be doing linear along with it as seen from the ground.

Initially the block is stationary,hence it will have no kinetic energy.

thunderhadron said:
But the major issue is that which law I should use to deduct block's velocity with respect to ring, when the ring is at the max height..

When the ring is at the maximum height,it will be at rest with respect to the block.Isnt it?? If this wasnt the case , how else can we deduce that the ring has attained maximum height .:smile:

Now ,regarding what is the common velocity of the ring and the block when the ring attains max height,what do you think are the forces acting on the system(ring+block) ? What can be conserved ?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
I am trying to solve this problem but it seems that I am missing out something while conserving energy. Initially, the ring has kinetic energy (rotational+translational). When the ring is at maximum height, the ring and the body B, both have kinetic energy too. But when I solve it, I don't get the right answer.
The text is not clear. It says that the ring rolls on the horizontal part of the body B, and the surfaces are smooth. That means no friction between the ring and B, so the ring can not roll on the surface of B. I think the problem should be interpreted that the ring was rolling before reaching B and it keeps the initial rotation energy during its motion.

ehild
 
ehild said:
...it keeps the initial rotation energy during its motion.

How? :confused:

If I do as you say, i get the option b) but why it keeps its intial rotational energy?
 
  • #10
What changes it if there is no friction? Think of a tyre on ice.

If the ring keeps rolling along the surface of B, it becomes in rest with respect to B at the end and looses all rotational energy. At what height?

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Tanya Sharma said:
Initially the block is stationary,hence it will have no kinetic energy.



When the ring is at the maximum height,it will be at rest with respect to the block.Isnt it?? If this wasnt the case , how else can we deduce that the ring has attained maximum height .:smile:

Now ,regarding what is the common velocity of the ring and the block when the ring attains max height,what do you think are the forces acting on the system(ring+block) ? What can be conserved ?


I was not saying for the starting time at t = 0. My total statements were for (after t = 0).
and I know that linear momentum is also conserved along with that but still I m not getting the answer.

mv = 2mv'
i.e. v' = v/2

1/2 mv2 + 1/2(mr2)v2/r2 = mgh + 1/2. (2m) (v/2)2

after solving this,
h = 3v2/4g

which is not correct. Isn't it.

So please try to get correct approach. There is something missing here still.
 
  • #12
You assumed that the rotational energy becomes zero at the end. The book assumes that it is unchanged.

ehild
 
  • #13
ehild said:
You assumed that the rotational energy becomes zero at the end. The book assumes that it is unchanged.

ehild

Thank you I got the correct answer and explanation.
thank you ehild.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K